Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Transportation

Denver Airport Overrun by Car-Eating Rabbits 278

It turns out the soy-based wire covering on cars built after 2002 is irresistible to rodents. Nobody knows this better than those unlucky enough to park at DIA's Pikes Peak lot. The rabbits surrounding the area have been using the lot as an all-you-can-eat wiring buffet. Looks like it's time to break out The Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch.

Comment Re:Proof??? (Score 1) 307

This.

It's not like Israel is the only country / group / whatever in the world who doesn't like Iran.

I know that if I were writing something that targetted a group, I'd add in at least a few things that pointed to "someone other than me", if only to confuse the matter / feed the conspiracy theorists.

Like, if I were targetting Israel with something, I'd have to slap in something about Mel Gibson being the source.

Comment What we'd heard... (Score 4, Informative) 116

Where I am, is a lot less on the "secret agent" / James Bond side of things, and a lot more on social engineering.

Two vectors were talked about.

Vector 1: Middle East. Some guys decided they wanted to be insurgents, but didn't have explosives experience and really didn't want to be shot at. So instead, they loaded up viruses on a bunch of hardware (external drives, thumb drives, etc) and sold it to soldiers. Said soldiers then turned around and used these drives on not only their personal computers, but also on Unclass and Classified systems, where it quickly spread because of bad IS/IA policies.

Vector 2: Pentagon area. Similar situation, but instead of selling pre-infected items, some foreign power just left a lot of pre-infected thumb drives around various coffee shops, etc. While some were turned in to lost and found, others were picked up by people who said, "Hey! Free thumb drive!" and proceeded to use them at work and at home. And when work was in a government office that, again had poor IS/IA policies, suddenly you've got computers opening holes in firewalls and transmitting data out.

Hence the big change in policy, to ban thumb drives, turn off auto-run, etc.

HP

Submission + - Navy Almost Ready to Torpedo NMCI (wired.com)

NecroPuppy writes: The US Navy finally finds themselves in sight of the end of their contract with NMCI.. Depending on who you ask, the Naval Marine Corp Intranet (acronym explained so you don't have to come up with your own meaning), has been the best thing to happen to the Navy, a massive waste of taxpayer money, a less than useful implementation, or a massive boondoggle. Possiblly multiple of those at the same time. A bit of history, before people start laying all the blame on HP: EDS (who started the contract) was originally a standalone company that was only recently bought by HP. (Not that HP has done much better with the contract.)

Comment Re:Political entity required to comply? (Score 1) 438

It depends on the nature of the treaties between the two governments.

Just because the US Government wants something from another government doesn't mean they're going to automatically get it, even when a treaty is involved. National laws may carve out exceptions, and sometimes the government in question will just say "no", regardless of the treaties that are in place.

Comment Re:I don't understand (Score 1) 100

True, but the government often sets purchasing rules where they get the same deal as the best customer.

That is, if some of the customers get 10% off, some get 15% off, and some get 20% off, then the government gets the 20% off deal.

It isn't retroactive, mind you. If the best deal the corporation had was 15% off when the government bought X amount of gear, and then goes to 20% off six weeks later, the government doesn't get the extra 5% back. But they would get that on any new purchases made while that applied.

Add to that government purchase requirements involving small / minority / women owned businesses, vendor rotation requirements, minimum/maximum purchase, etc, and it can be extremely hard to keep up with it all.

Comment Re:What difference does it make? (Score 2, Insightful) 253

It's a 750 dollar minimum with, as I recall, a few criteria that can allow for triple damages, such as willfull infringement.

So really, that is, by law, the miminum he could have been hit for.

Ultimately, if the RIAA decides to go back on the "sue-em-all" bandwagon, they'll just start raising the number of songs. Instead of going after someone for 24 songs, they'll instead go after them for 100 songs.

Slashdot Top Deals

"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire

Working...