<i>completely against what they stand for</i><br>They oppose money?

He must be planning a quick divorce in the summer holidays.

jngpu bhg gurl'er ba gb hf

Which of those constituted the crime for which the laptop was summarily excuted?

Well, at least you give us an option; I've heard worse.
From North America as well.

I guess it still doesn't run on x86_64 with installing a lot of 32 bit junk.

As mentioned by others: A reasonable time is set by law and depends on the price of the product; 3 years for a laptop is normal but for a (new) house the warranty period for construction errors may extend to 20 years.

I never accept those extended offers; If you have a bad device and it breaks within the reasonable period that you may expect it to work you don't need the extended warranty.
If you expect to beat the insurance company at a game they set up themselves you might be better off gambling with the insurance premium in a casino.

Ok, so when Microsoft steals chinese code it must be Microsoft chinese doing the stealing, so it doesn't count?
Does that myopic trick work with the profits for Microsoft as well, as in "profits made in foreign countries do not count"?

For a recent list see: http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/cases/index.html

Hah, You just wait until there's a story about jellied eels, smoked beer or lutefisk.

It's relative to the user. It's just like "a challenge", when you're an incompetent idiot everything looks like one.

I think UDF might cover all of exFat's use cases, with no patents pending and secret specifications involved.
So where's the profit in that?

Don't blame us parents, this is the FTC talking about control.

Windows for PPC64 is finally available?