The issue is people (as companies) are fundamentally selfish. Linux came about because Linus wanted to play with a kernel. Everyone else just kinda jumped on board expanding it. There just happened to be an ecosystem of open source software readily available to run on Linux without much changes. Then Slackware, and later on, Redhat happened. Then the commercialization happened. It won't happen the other way around, with diverse companies throwing in money to create a product. If we are lucky, they might start support Godot better, who knows.

you are not very bright are you? *looks at username* oh. Carry on.

If the person you are writing down your credit card info on a piece of paper and handing it off to, does not know how to keep your information secure, WTF are you doing handing it off to them?

Every time you explain yourself more, it shows how much you identify with the criminal. You need mental help, and therapy. Please go get them before you end up being a criminal yourself.

What even are you arguing for? If a woman is raped multiple times, the rapist is charged with multiple counts of rape. Are you so stupid that you are arguing against that?

Just how fucked up are you?

Doesn't work if it's quicksand...

That's still not "Apple pays Adobe" is it?

Like how Joseph McCarthy and the House Un-American Activities Committee have so much positive value to them, right? How Dr Martin Luther King Jr and Mohammad Ali were branded communists, and so many other lives destroyed during the Red Scare?

And ultimately, that would raise your bill. At which point, the punters would see that. That's the way it works across the rest of the world. Why do you think USA is so special?

More importantly, when they remove the pinky promise not to do it clause, they will already have the rights *FROM THE DAY THEY FIRST GAVE IT TO THEMSELVES*. On top of that, they have the right to use your data for non-AI training purposes, and to sell it to other AI training companies *TODAY*

Doesn't matter. They will have that license to your stuff *FROM TODAY* and they can use your stuff *FROM TODAY* once they remove that "we pinky promise not to use it" line some time in the future.

Nobody ever claimed SMS is secure. How you came to that understanding is bizarre. However, if you are comparing E2E encrypted platforms like Signal, MLS, or iMessage to SMS and saying anything is better than SMS, you are avoiding the question, which is, why would ANYONE want to integrate with Google, if Google was going to bend over for countries that demand they poke a hole in it.

For a blind moderator? Removing their ability to do their job? Sure, you might feel it's not worth a fuck, but that removes their ability to do their job. You end up with /r/blind having no blind moderators. Guess what happens then? You end up with assholes like you who don't know what they go through and use *YOUR* opinion on what to give a fuck about, rather than what the blind community feel they need. Having empathy is useful.

I don't see how this does not fail the GPL test. All Amazon, Oracle, etc have to do is to buy one copy, and then they can demand access to the GPL'ed source code as a customer. IF Redhat subsequently terminates their license, that goes against the GPL, doesn't it?