Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:'Murica (Score 1) 48

Funny how leftists are always 100% "no human is illegal" when talking about some brown person jumping Mexican border wall and stealing some redneck's job, but become 100% hardcore racists when talking about different-shade-of-brown person, landing at Los Angeles airport, H1B visa in hand, and heading for Silicon Valley to "steal" some hipster techie job. *Those* people need to be booted immediately. For their own good of course. Funny that.

Funny how some people think that every job that an immigrant took is one that everyone wanted and the pay is what everyone will accept. How many of those rednecks actually want to work long hours outside for little pay? I would guess very few because no one is stopping them from showing up at a farm to pick crops. The best example of how flawed this line of thinking is Brexit.

One of the core reasons of Brexit was to control the borders so foreign (but legal) labor would be reduced. However for some industries like agriculture foreign labor made up the majority of the workforce. Brexiteers got their wish and those pesky foreigners no longer got their jobs. So British people took those jobs? Hell no. There is such a severe labor shortage for agriculture workers that some farmers simply refuse to plant some crops as they would just rot in the fields waiting to be harvested. It is like there was a reason those jobs employed foreign labor as they were difficult, had long hours, and little pay that British people refused to do.

Comment Re:If MS can finally give us a standard Arm platfo (Score 1) 147

I think he means the lack of a standard way to boot the OS and the lack of a universal framebuffer standard like VBE (aka VESA). To put it in plain terms, Canonical can release a single x86-64 iso and it will boot on every PC made in the past 15 years (and with a graphical installer too!) even if the OS has to use VESA mode until the user loads the GPU drivers. Good luck doing something like that on ARM, you have to put out an image for every little ARM board out there because every ARM board uses its own bootloader standard.

But that is not why Windows on ARM has failed. Remember MS has and still has a lot of authority and final approval on which ARM chips ran/runs WoA. So they could dictate things like bootloader standard. The main reason so far is that Windows on ARM is it required special versions of programs as opposed to running Windows x86 programs which negates any real advantage to using Windows vs another OS.

And then there are issues with some SoCs drivers requiring a forked kernel for stuff like the GPU to work.

That might be an issue with any random Linux. That is not really an issue with Windows as MS could control that.

Comment Re:If MS can finally give us a standard Arm platfo (Score 1) 147

You've never tried to use one of the many Arm SoCs with Linux?

Yes I have. What do you think Android and ChromeOS are? Variants of Linux. What ARM SOCs do they run on? Many different ones.

Windows on Arm is nonexistent thus far.

Windows on ARM has existed for over a decade and failed. You seem to blame that all on ARM standardization when that is not even close to the problem. The problem is anyone running Windows expects that all Windows programs should run on it. Not some to few Windows programs. That was the previous failure of Windows on ARM. Every "Windows" program needed a special ARM version.

Linux on Arm is a horrible experience frankly except for a very few number of devices such as the Pi, but even there, there are proprietary bits.

Android and Chromebook users may disagree with you on this. The issue is not "Linux" or ARM in general. The issue is if both are designed to work together. Google has put in a lot of effort to ensure their version of Linux works with ARM chips from their partners. Also Android and Chromebook programs have no backwards compatibility with x86 versions to worry about.

Every device requires a distro and kernel fork for the particular chipset. Like I said, no standardization of the platform at all. I cannot just download a standard, generic distro and run it on any Arm device. This is quite different from the Intel world.

You are looking at the wrong problem. Standardization has very little to do with it as MS has dictated exactly which ARM chips pass Windows certification. Again see Android. As for the Intel world it is the same problem. You cannot run Windows that you installed on an AMD desktop on an Intel desktop. You have to reinstall Windows as there is enough variation to where Windows does not work properly.

If MS wants to do what Android does and rely the vendors to provide crappy interfaces to the hardware, they sure could. But we all know how well Windows RT worked out for them.

Again, that was not the problem as MS could deny their vendors chips certification if they wanted. The problem AGAIN is that Windows on ARM programs were not compatible with Windows x86 programs. That required software vendors to make ARM versions.

Comment Re:Woohoo! I've aged out. (Score 1) 41

Unfortunately older titles is what many Xbox owners have had to endure for a while PS owners have gotten some decent new titles. Heck some of the titles like God of War have been ported to PC but not to Xbox. Bear in mind, MS has purchased many studios but have not gotten a lot of good exclusive titles. Xbox owners got mediocre to terrible titles like Starfield, Redfall, and even Halo 5.

Comment Re:If MS can finally give us a standard Arm platfo (Score 2) 147

I do not understand what you are describing. ARM licenses their designs to others to make chips. There is standardization when it comes to ARM like the current ARM v8 APIs. The difference is that companies who license ARM can customize the chips the way they want. Does the chip need to be able to hardware decode Google VP8, h265, etc. or use 2.5Gb Ethernet? A smartphone chip is going to be different than a laptop or tablet chip.

Windows on ARM has been a thing for over a decade and it has been a miserable failure. I do not have much hope that MS can get it right this time.

Comment Re:Ironically the GOP in Texas is anti green energ (Score 1) 120

Again, winterizing wouldn't have helped during this event. It doesn't help in any ice storm, all turbines have to shut down during ice storm.

Citation needed. Remember, I do not accept anything you say as true given your penchant for lying.

The mistake Texas made was not shutting down the turbines earlier because the weather forecast had poorly indicated its severity.

Citation needed.

Wind turbines should be shut down before any wind or ice storm, they have brakes for that exact purpose so they are not ripped apart by imbalance in the blades or high rotational speeds

Citation needed. You do know the winter storm was mostly about prolonged subfreezing weather and snow, right? You do know cold temperatures and snow happens all the time in winter in the north right?

That is something I learned in the 90s during my EE education, but sure, don't believe the guy that wrote a thesis on renewable energy.

[sarcasm]And your EE education completely validates everything you said about the petrochemical and energy industry[/sarcasm]. That's like saying a chemical engineer is an expert in integrated circuit design.

You are the one that are putting up the strawman that production of raw gas is tied to consumption of refined gas, which you yourself disproved and can be easily seen by comprehensive reading of the articles you put up.

AGAIN, I have NEVER said anything like that. You keep making up what I have said. What I said is you don't understand SUPPLY and keep talking about demand.

How does it feel to be wrong all the time?

That is a question you need to answer. Also why do you lie ALL the time? We can scroll up to show every time you lied. And continue to lie.

Comment Re:Boeing engine cover? (Score 1) 182

The Boeing 737-800 was first delivered in 1988. There have been over 5,000 of them sold. This particular plane was delivered to Southwest Airlines in June 2015. The chances that it is some sort of design flaw is less likely considering the numbers. It is more likely this was a maintenance issue where a mechanic did not do something correctly.

Comment Re:Boeing engine cover? (Score 1) 182

What if the guy who designed the cowling fasteners at Boeing never actually had to use a wrench to take the thing off and on and made it so it is a stupid pain for mechanics?

I would imagine that taking the cowling off a jet engine should be a stupid pain. This is an engine cowling not an automobile hood. The number of times it has to be done is few.

What if a fastener rusted due to failure of another more critical and warrantied part?

1) Rust take time. Years, decades sometimes. That would be on the airplane's owner to maintain and fix any rusted parts. 2)Also considering most of the plane uses aluminum and not carbon steel, rust is not something that just happens on commercial planes.

Do you own Boeing stock?

Do you murder children? I'm not saying you do but it is interesting you've never denied murdering children. #whatatoutism

Slashdot Top Deals

I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato

Working...