Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:define:Carrier Grade (Score 1) 165

I actually like NAT when used at home scale. With NAT there's only one way in and out the network, and it's very simple to collectively control what goes out and what goes in. Managing a set of IPs would be less convenient, especially when I have services I want to be visible only to LAN. With NAT, everything is LAN-only by default. It is quite similar to the whitelisting approach in information security, the NAT approach shares many of the benefits and drawbacks.

You can accomplish exactly that without nat, it's just a firewall set to deny only (in fact unless you do that even with nat your lan is almost as open as without nat.) The big #1 benefit to nat is your internal addresses aren't dependent on your isp's configuration, it allows you to have your own subnetting that YOU control without having an AS and address assignment.

Comment Re:leaked huh ? (Score 1) 899

There are plenty of hunters who use handguns, further it's nice to have a gun that can fit in your survival bag and store the ammunition in a secure manner. a 30 round magazine can last you a while if you are a good shot. If it's your thing you could easily go out in the wilderness and stay on an extended trip using just your high capacity rifle to hunt and take food. Commercial hunters also have a need to carry extended capacity magazines. Alligator hunters in a busy area may move from line to line to line non stop being able to not have to stop to reload as often can increase your take for the day or if you come into an area with more than 5 alligators on the water all right on the surface allow you to pop one, move to get it then while your partner is bringing it into the boat pop the next before the gators have a chance to leave the area. Commercial alligator hunters can have hundreds of tags to fill in a single month, you're talking about severely handicapping those people and drastically increasing the population of gators in the area if they are unable to fill their tags.

Comment Re:F*ck off, gun haters (Score 1) 899

I know the difference between gun crime and violent crime, I know gun crime has doubled in the UK since the gun ban and violent crime has gone up in Australia since the gun ban. I also know that there is no ban on gun crime research just as I checked, look into it sure enough there's a narrow restriction on gun crime research

Comment Re:F*ck off, gun haters (Score 1) 899

It's all cherry picking and distortion. That's why I pointed you at Snopes.

You pointed me to a snopes article that doesn;t even cover violent crime in response to Australia violent crime. It's entirely irrelevant to anything in this discussion. If you notice my sources all cite studies, check the studies you'll notice you're wrong.

Comment Re:F*ck off, gun haters (Score 1) 899

Then you have an inability to read
Australia Violent crime rose when guns became more controled (note snopes does not debunk this and doesn't even address it so stop citing it as a response) http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17847/
England gun crime rose 35% as of 2003 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-154307/Gun-crime-soars-35.html/
and had doubled as of 2012 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323777204578195470446855466.html/

Comment Re:F*ck off, gun haters (Score 1) 899

The statistics in england show gun crime rose when guns became more controlled and violent crime rose when guns became more controlled, try reading the link he linked you to and notice how it says violent crime while snopes says gun crime (violent crime is a superset of guncrime and the snopes article only covers a small subset of violent crime, see how they can both be right?)

Comment Re:Guns are NOT a problem and DONT cause deaths (Score 1) 899

Switzerland has the lowest violent crime and gun related crime in the entire world, they have been number 1 for decades. Yet the twist is in Switzerland citizens are required to own a gun. All citizens are given a gun, ammunition and have annual training.

Just FYI Switzerland has strict controls on guns and ammunition, the ammunition comes in cans and is accounted for regularly if the can is opened that's a fine there, any bullets missing must be accounted for. If there's a shooting and your ammunition is missing (they search everyone in the vicinity after a shooting) then you're automatically a suspect. The NRA does not endorse Switzerland style gun controls. But you're right with the last bit, the reason Switzerland has low violent crime has nothing to do with gun control and everything to do with how they take care of their people. Fortunately if you look at the world violent crime rates they're dropping everywhere (well everywhere except Australia) so maybe some day we'll all be as low as Switzerland is now and we can all strive to attain Switzerland's new ultra low violent crime rate consisting of drive by resurrections!

Comment Re:Mental Evaluations (Score 1) 899

currently in my State, registration and background checks for Rifles don't exist, they do for Hand Guns.

You must not live in the US then, dealers must perform a background check on all cartridge weapons, only black powder guns and airguns are exempt from that requirement.

I can go down town to a Pawn shop, walk in and walk out with a crippled AK47, come home and order some parts...and have a fully automatic weapon to mow down some folks I'm pissed at.

Well that and don't forget your visit to the machine shop, also don't be surprised when the atf shows up at the same time as your parts. They tend to keep a close watch on parts that can be used to make an automatic weapon. Have them shipped to a name and address not on the list of registered machine guns and they take an interest in it.

I am under firm belief the second amendment pertains to Law enforcement and Military usage.

The second amendment applies to the people and the militia, look it up it uses both of those terms, it doesn't say military or law enforcement in it. Further the guys who came up with the second amendment... said things like

"The right of the people to keep and bear... arms shall not infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country..." - James Madison, I Annuals of Congress 434 (June 8, 1789).

(emphasis mine)

"I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public servants." - George Mason, 3 Elliot, Debates at 425-426.

Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom? Congress shall have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American.... The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." - Tench Coxe

"... the British Parliament was advised, by an artful man to disarm the people that was the best and most effective way to enslave the people - but they should not do it openly; but to weaken them and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and neglecting the militia." - George Mason, Virginia Ratifying Convention, 1778.

If you look at it they intended for the second amendment to apply to everyone EXCEPT for law enforcement and the military. Law Enforcement officers and military members are not allowed to bear whatever arms they please and are required to bear arms in accordance with the respective policies governing use of arms. The United States Supreme Court even went so far as to disconnect the militia requirement (and if you read the history of the second amendment this makes sense that clause was originally there to protect people who had religious reasons for refusing to bear arms and ended up neutered to prevent abuses of that clause by the government to disarm its people) the Supreme court had this to say in Heller V. DC

The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

and on the militia clause

The Amendment’s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause’s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms

Comment Re:leaked huh ? (Score 1) 899

There were quite a few incidences of break ins where when caught the offender admitted to using the list to do their shopping and some more breakins where the place was trashed and nothing disappeared but the gun safe. Further we have had quite a few reports of corrections officers being threatened by inmates who used the map to find out where the officers live.

Slashdot Top Deals

Get hold of portable property. -- Charles Dickens, "Great Expectations"

Working...