Get a nice 16 gauge pump shotgun. Just aim in the general direction and you are gonna hit something with one shot.
Yeah, maybe your kid if you're that inept to believe what you just wrote.
I couldn't let this one fly just in case somebody reads this and takes it seriously. The shotgun does not throw a basketball-sized ball of death down the fucking hallway. At 3-4 meters it's more than likely going to be the size of a tennis ball depending on the ammunition used, as well as the choke and other aspects of the weapon in question.
And if you don't think that double-aught buckshot can't burn through an interior wall and whack little Timmy, I've got a bridge to sell you.
In addition, the whole First Amendment issue: I've got friends of mine in the NRA and other firearms organizations who are receiving death threats from left-wing morons. Thoughts on inciting violence? Hmmm??? Was the purpose of the article to inform or inflame? You mentioned that many interpretations are valid. I think the article was written for sensationalism and page hits.
in USA, drugs ("speed" and similar) and nutrition (e.g. sexual desire suppressant in food) to alter behavior has been going on since Viet Nam war at least
Amphetamines yes, I've seen the cites. Sexual desire suppressant? Don't tell me you bought into the whole 'saltpeter' horse shit. That was debunked a long time ago.
Yeah, he might sell more spots in this venture if he gave away a few free bonus spots to some hot young blondes.
They're called 'furniture'.
That's a great quote but it only serves to highlight the "do as I say, not as I do" mentality of U.S. politics.
That's why I'm not a big fan of Reagan, as previously stated. I do, however, agree with the sentiment of his statement. Own up to your actions.
And yet countries that ban ownership of assault rifles and handguns by the average person don't have these crimes. They just don't.
How many of those countries have the Second Amendment?
Don't even go there with the whole interpretation issue; you'll lose that battle.
State and federal courts historically have used two models to interpret the Second Amendment: the now generally accepted individual rights model, and the "collective rights" model, which holds that the right is dependent on militia membership. While having influenced a number of past court cases, the "collective rights" model has been discarded by the U.S. Supreme Court, in favor of the individual rights model.
Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.