Comment Usual Guardian Bollocks (Score 3, Informative) 71
I wouldn't wipe my arse with anything printed in the Guardian. It is anti-nuclear be it weapons or power generation. It's happy to support the benefits of nuclear isotopes generated in reactors for therapy use in the NHS though.
As for the toxic radiation plume - how exactly is that going to happen ? The waste is held under water. There are no reactors there to have a catastrophic explosion with material spreading anything high into the atmosphere.
It's no secret that Sellafield is aging and it has a legacy to clean up that will take many decades, it's been covered many times before.
But comparing it to Chernobyl is lazy, scaremongering journalism.
Oh and number of people killed or maimed or who suffered damage in the Windscale fire in the 1950s : zero. There have been projections of deaths due to emissions of the fire but they are purely statistical in nature and would not even register in cancer death numbers.