Are they collaborating with The Audubon Society? I'm sure they'd be interested in the reduction of an internationally renowned major corpus of reference to "well, that's just what _he_ called them", particularly as it's their field too.

Well, we tried contacting Galactus, who could just put his hand in the way for a bit, but all the calls went to voicemail.

This was also the case for Centipede. Was written with 4.77MHz in mind. Trying to play it on even the Amstrad PC1512 at 8MHz was an exercise in futility.

"All these worlds are yours, except QUARKLEPLAR. Attempt no landings there."

It wasn't meant for us, we're just eavesdropping about 8 billion years later.

My nose bleeds in sympathy that Mrs Sunak will have less income she is supposed to declare to HMRC.

Demolition Man had one of these.

Troubled Guy : I don't know... lately I just don't feel like there's anything special about me.

Booth : You are an incredibly sensitive man, who inspires joy-joy feelings in all those around you.

Disordinate is equally cromulent.

That was the problem. Plus he didn't get permission to expand upon that work from the Tolkien estate.

As a bonus, he tried suing Amazon saying that RoP infringed _his_ copyright.

> “When you get a crime scene image from CCTV or something like that, do you agree it would be useful to be able to do a facial recognition search across DVLA records as well as the other records that can currently be accessed?”

I wonder how long it would take for "a crime scene image from" to be quietly dropped should this pass. I'll guess about .0005 New York minutes.

A secure location, where it is being studied by top men.

If "nuclear good" was true, the proposed power stations would have been approved in 2010 and be on-stream by now. We also would have reduced gas imports so wouldn't have cared much if anything happened to NordStream or has prices thanks to a certain Russian president's "military operations".

Instead we have "nuclear bad, we'll just let the populace pay through the nose to foreign companies for their energy. Why, yes, I am a shareholder, since you ask".

None of the example named companies have a UK presence. Hence the likely Arkell v Pressdram response to a fine.

Also note the fine amount. They looked at GDPR maximum fines (4% of turnover) and just picked a higher number to make it look like they're serious. In reality, not one fine will be collected as the companies will just tell them to fuck off. They already know this, so no fine will be issued in the first place. It's all "think of the children" bullshit.

Also: if I'm not about to upload an image of my driving license for age / identity verification for the NHS app I'm certainly not going to do so for a porn site just because the sex pests in government want to restrict the electorate from doing something they freely do in the House of Commons.

Of course you do

Because cheese is denser than helium.