I think since Bootcamp, everyone just assumed that Mac users were just dual booting to play games. Not always true, though (and a real inconvenience).
Why would mac users dual boot (and consider that "conventient), and Linux users run wine? Most Linux users run LInux on windows-compatible computers.
You can build FLOSS windows apps and run them on wine on your ARM Linux machine.
Oh, because it's too hard to implement a 1997 protocol? (IMAP IDLE)
The first time I saw that I knew I was not getting a blackberry.
Then you didnt do your research very well, because BIS is the ghetto "i cant afford a BES" experience. A proper BES is magnitudes more secure than anything SSL has to offer.
[citation needed]
Seriously.
There's absolutely no evidence to back this up. With SSL and my own server, I'm sure nobody's listening to my connection. The same can't be said for BES, because, seriously, we don't know!
A networkless computer?
Ultra-delicate files can be handled on offline computers, and moved around in physical devices, and encrypted.
That greatly depends on the Language being used.
I used to work using Python, and eclipse is almost useless during refactoring. The same applies to most dynamically typed languages (or, in this case, duck-typed).
Just like people used to trust Google more than Microsoft. Times change, and so do companies.
There's also the fact that open sourcing it allows implementations for ANY architecture and platform, not just those they choose.
It's not 1st amendment, it's fair use (for a parody). It's ok to use stuff that other people own a copyright to if the sole purpose is parody (it's fair use). This is clearly the case.
Have you ever noticed WHEN chrome[ium] updates? Nope.
Firefox show you this "checking addon compatibility" for a minute after every update. Some addons used to break (not anymore though). Those negative points are what made the rapid-release so awful.
Google released Chrome 28 yesterday
I updated to Chormium 28 on 19 June 2013. Why is Google Chrome getting released one month after Chromium?
AFAIK, RDP lets you see the entire remote screen, not the windows of a single program. There's a big difference. Imagine GIMP; with xorg+ssh you get 4 floating windows. With RDP, you have a the remote desktop with 4 windows inside of it. You can't stack remote and local windows as freely.
Weston is a replacement for Xorg; it's the reference implementation for Wayland, NOT a window manager.
Way too much power usage. Unless you run something like a SIP server on something that actually requires so much hardware, you can shrink that a lot.
Actually, it's not 100% wikipedia. It displays smart information on top.
I remember searching for an apache httpd configuration directive last week, and DDG showed a snippet of the documentation on top. It was exactly what I was looking for. It's slightly smart, and rather helpful in general.
Personally, I use DDG as my primary search engine. But when I need to look for very specific issues (why is my commanlink not working with X and Y in JSF), I find that google gives better results. Google still works better if you have lots of keywords or long sentances, but otherwise DDG is enough.
Could you please elaborate why being backed by Oracle makes Java safer? How does this apply to other Sun products that Oracle has discontinued? Did Oracle over promise not to screw up Java, or end support for old versions? If so, can we trust them?
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.
