Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:WTF (Score -1) 338

IMHO, you cower behind a chosen pseudonym while hypocritically attempting to make policy for the society you've removed yourself from.

i'm sure parents of molested children would be comforted to know that the individuals who molested their children weren't "real" sex offenders.

i'm assuming you don't have a law degree, correct?

i'm assuming you don't have a medical or psychology doctorate, correct?

so, do you just have a hunch about how sex offenders operate, or do you know from personal experience?

cower some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

Comment Re:*Now* can we admit PHP sucks? (Score 3, Insightful) 213

i've been saying this about intel chips for DECADES... why won't anyone listen? INTEL CHIPS SUCK! they once handled a single floating point edge case incorrectly! AND THEN THEY FIXED IT! WHY WOULD ANYONE USE AN INTEL CHIP?

ignorant hypocritical marketeering = the highest level of insight.

slashdot = stagnated.

Comment Re:Goes both ways... (Score 1) 645

YOU are internally inconsistent... so you cannot be true?

you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower behind your chosen pseudonym some more, feeb.

preach in the name of God while hypocritically labeling yourself as simply "an atheist".

a lie implies something that COULD be true... i never said lie. your use of the word is very telling.

you're an idiot.

Comment Re:There are two types of patenters (Score -1, Flamebait) 129

there is only one type of idiot... kaptink appears to be just that.

what about corporate employees given cash bonuses for patents regardless of content? what about lawyers acting in good faith to protect inventor acquaintances?

keep painting your tiny world in black and white.

you're an idiot.

Comment Re:Goes both ways... (Score 1) 645

no one said it was... you simply have again chosen to demonstrate your ignorance.

in order for a question to BE a question, an audience must be well defined. calling something a question and putting the mark of a question at the end of it while it could never be properly answered is not an act of inanity, it's an act of hypocrisy.

you're an idiot.

preach your status as simply "an atheist" some more in the name of God while you cower behind your chosen pseudonym.

you're completely pathetic.

Comment Re:Goes both ways... (Score 1) 645

no, it's specifically hypocritical to ask the specific question asked because any answer is irrelevant because the existence of such a person capable of answering the question contradicts the implications made through the act of asking it.

you're a logical peabrain.

preach some more in the name of God. label yourself with a single word. define your being in the negative sense relative towards objects your definitions claim do not exist.

you're an ignorant hypocrite.

cower some more, feeb.

you're completely pathetic.

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...