Your definition of pornography is quite different then my definition. If the girl (or boy, for that matter) is clothed, it is not pornography. As an example for a even stricter definition of pornography, in Germany, for anything to count as pornography, it has at least to show penetration, or depict genitals in a "provoking" manner (e.g. an erect penis, or a slose-up shout of a vagina.)

There may be few countries that meet all proposals, but there are scores of countries that meet at least one of them.

No, what you really need is this. With the right frequency, you could probably bounce them out of the door.

Yeah, and everyone was blaming it on the earthquake. But it was the moon all along! And he would have gotten away with it, too, if it hadn't been for that meddling kids!

They could use 10/8. This would never be routed to the internet, but would be a syntactically correct IP address (and more compareable to the 555 telephone numbers, which are also usually syntacticaly correct)

Shamelessly copied from the youtube comments:

And you say there are no funny comments on YouTube!

Your car will probably have a lot more then just two busses. It will probably even have ECUs that are conected to more then two busses. However, I'd guess that in theroy the network of ECUs and busses will be fully connected, e.g. most systems report data to the dashboard, so that will be a point where many busses will meet. (Not that this would help taking over the bus or safety relevant systems in any relevant way)

That's simply wrong. Lots of safety relevant systems, like ESP, communicate via CAN (or FlexRey in more modern cars). So, in theory, if you hijacked the whole bus you could pretty easily kill everyone inside the car. In praxis, however, it's not quite that simple. e.g. the bus driver of a FlexRay bus will electrically prevent sending any data outside of your designated timeslot, so you can't override data send by other ECUs. (Not to mention that the only place data from the entertainment system and from safety related systems will meet is probably the dashboard, and that's pretty much a dead end).

Your definition is the definition of NP, not NP complete. NP is the set of all problems that are in NP and NP hard (i.e. all problems in NP can be reduced in polynomial time to a problem in NP-complete). If P=NP, all problems in NP can be reduced in polynomial time to any other problem in NP (because they can be solved in polynomial time)

Mod this up, and mod GP -1, plain wrong.

Nitpick: If P=NP, then factorisation, or any other problem in NP, is NP complete.

Wrong. If P=NP, all problems in NP (including NP complete and Co-NP problems) are solveable in polynomial time.

You got that wrong. If P=NP, then NP=Co-NP, so your public key cryptosystems are broken. (Also, if P=NP, all problems in P are NP complete)

According to the (slightly out-of-date) article, the whole of Europe sends less spam than the US. I'm quite sure there are more computers in Europe than in the US, as the population is more than 60% larger (only counting EU. The spam level in the article is likely about the whole continent, which has about 130% the population of the US), and the developement level is similar.

The need of generators depends on where you live. I live in an area that is neither prone to floods, nor earthquakes, nor storms. We have a pretty stable grid*. During my entire life I can remember four blackouts, the longest lasted about two hours. So currently I have no need of a generator.

*This may change if photovoltaic and wind energy increase and the planned extension of the grid is delayed. But for now, it's sufficiently stable

Film at eleven: Identifiers identify entities. I'm SHOCKED!