Known bogus accusations are standard cop-tricks to get you to confess to something, throw you off guard or make you reveal something.
Mod this up please. This is something everyone can learn from.
Given that I only got free internet at an airport when Google felt generous last holiday season, I'd gladly use it and gladly watch ads.
Given that Google, which is everyone's favorite monopoly, controls 90+ percent of Internet advertising, I wonder why they don't offer free Internet everywhere they can. Does anyone know why not?
But when you reach a certain age, it becomes harder and harder to meet new friends. I used to have tons of them, but then I moved to a new city and have almost none here. And if you're too old for the clubs, don't have a family, and aren't religious or a sports fan--you're pretty much SOL in many places
You should go to meetup.com. Seriously, check it out. There's lots of opportunities there to meet new friends.
In Brazil, proofs produced by illegal means cannot be used (Federal Constitution, Art. 5, Inc. LVI). Also, commiting a crime in order to produce proofs is aggravated up to a 1/3 (Decree-Law 2.848, Art. 342, Par. 1).
Of course, law vs. reality can be entirely different things.
It's just how capitalism works. If woman working for less pay, why pay them more?
Conversely, if you could get the same work out of a woman for less money, why would anyone ever hire a man?
What was the last time a doctor prescribed or recommended aspirin, which is far superior to any of the more expensive "anti-inflammatory" medicines which are used for arthritis, pain, etc?
Actually, you mean ibuprofen. Good point other than that.
If you just shrugged it off then only your coworkers would know you have a small dick. Now the whole world knows.
When a women is subjected to a hostile work environment, she might be told, "If you just shrugged it off then only your coworkers would know you are a slut. Now the whole world knows."
Clearly if this is said to a woman, then it is a blame-the-victim mentality and is wrong. It should also be wrong in this case, when it's a man who suffers from a hostile work environment.
The story IS about your right to not be laughed at for having an itty-bitty, tiny little pecker -- an issue that is of utmost importance to many slashdot readers (myself excluded, of course!)
I think this might actually be insightful. After all, the guys with big dicks were getting laid so much in high school that they had no need to develop their brains and become nerds. And the people who become nerds... well, it's simple logic.
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.