Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Earth

The Rise of Small Nuclear Plants 490

ColdWetDog writes "The Oil Drum (one of the best sites to discuss the technical details of the Macondo Blowout) is typically focused on ramifications of petroleum use, and in particular the Peak Oil theory. They run short guest articles from time to time on various aspects of energy use and policies. Today they have an interesting article on small nuclear reactors with a refreshing amount of technical detail concerning their construction, use, and fueling. The author's major thesis: 'Pick up almost any book about nuclear energy and you will find that the prevailing wisdom is that nuclear plants must be very large in order to be competitive. This assumption is widely accepted, but, if its roots are understood, it can be effectively challenged. Recently, however, a growing body of plant designers, utility companies, government agencies, and financial players are recognizing that smaller plants can take advantage of greater opportunities to apply lessons learned, take advantage of the engineering and tooling savings possible with higher numbers of units, and better meet customer needs in terms of capacity additions and financing. The resulting systems are a welcome addition to the nuclear power plant menu, which has previously been limited to one size — extra large.'"

Comment Re:Wait... They want them to dumb things down... (Score 1) 511

Well, how about you're wrong! Carbon Dioxide is already dense enough in the atmosphere that it blocks about all of the outgoing radiation that it could possibly block, adding more CO2 only amounts to lowering the level in the atmosphere where the radiation is blocked. So a doubling of CO2 will only make a slight blip in the temperature. That much is settled science and what happens after that is where it gets complicated. The warmists say that as a result of this slight CO2 induced warming other resulting changes produce a positive feedback that will cause a dramatic rise in temperatures while the skeptics contend that isn't so. And that is the part that is NOT settled science.

Comment Re:Not just Google (Score 1) 543

"Wait 'til the next recession wipes out 70% of your 401k. If you've been around long enough, you got wiped out in 1987, then again in 2001, and then again in 2009. " Your making some poor choices with your 401K. I've lived through those market ups-and-downs and I usually just see them as a buying opprotunity. Keep your monthly investments going and don't think about them (much) until retirement and you'll be doing better than 90% of everyone else out there.

Slashdot Top Deals

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...