Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Python? (Score 4, Insightful) 794

Evidently, you don't go out that much. People use interpreted languages in science all the time. At least I do. Where I sit, there is quite a bit of spare capacity waiting. When I try to figure something out it is way more reasonable to write a program in three-four hours and have it run overnight than to write it in two days and have it run in (say) thirty minutes.

Comment Re:Google Lawyer Alexander Macgillivray's Blog (Score 1) 328

I am not convinced. I never denied that a dude with a camera can generate a story. Evidently, this happens all the time. But can he pursue the story? Frequently a problem which for the public starts with a news-flash, usually has a beginning and a follow-up, rarely captured live by a member of the public.
As for Journalist Union which will 'negotiate access, payment...' - payment of what? For now the stance of aggregators is that 'the stuff should be free and you guys just pay your own way through advertising, which we will kindly handle for you'. Not to mention that the union model, especially when the membership is in practice mandatory, has its own set of problems.
Besides, did you notice that the guy who took the photos went with it to a newspaper, which 1) published it 2) dispatched its paid hounds to chase the story. I am afraid that the 'paid hounds' part is indispensable for the chief cop to start explaining himself to the public.

Comment Re:Google Lawyer Alexander Macgillivray's Blog (Score 0, Flamebait) 328

Citizen journalism... OK, try thw following... Show up during a demonstration which is about to turn ugly with a camera, take some pictures. Now, since it is good to get both sides of the story, go interview one of the cops. Introduce yourself as a 'citizen yournalist'. Once in jail, call family / relatives and ask them to post the bond for you. Once you are out, try to get you camera back. File a lawsuit to get your removed photos back...

Comment Re:No. The Internet is creating madness. (Score 1) 328

I can only support what you wrote. I feel that a certain type of looking at world and world's affairs, best embodied by a persistent, even if sometimes slightly dodgy, newspaper reporter, seems to be going away. A lofty name for that: investigative journalism. Google offers to replace it by, as you put it, a combination of press releases and dog show reports. When it comes to getting to the bottom of things, well meaning bloggers will not even stand a chance against a desk sergeant of Wichita police, let alone against any government. And all that web seems to offer instead is 'alternative news' which usually is a nice moniker for web outfit of fringe groups and conspiracy theorists.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry

Working...