We are talking linux. I am probably running applications from a shared
I am still going to delegate the work to junior admin or desktop support person not the end user. The person I was replying to is an end user.
If I were your administrator, I don't want you installing anything anyway as you can break the system. So why is this a problem?
This isn't the only use. I watched an interview with the guy who invented the cool plasma. It can be used to sterilize hands as well. You know the sterilization chamber from Star Trek, the one you enter with your clothes off after coming back from a planet and get eradiated. Well you can do that too with cool plasma.
Redhat isn't running Gnome#, they are running Gnome. You are assuming that they would follow Gnome if it's switches to Gnome#.
Yeah whatever. If the processor you are compiling for isn't fast enough to compile it's own code, you just use a cross compiler.
Even then you can build clusters for compiling faster if you need to. Compiling isn't an issue.
Who modded this dribble insightful? Redhat will be fine even if they have to remove Gnome. THis is complete nonsense.
Redhat would never put themselves in that position. If Gnome started to include patented software which it doesn't have the rights to include, Redhat would fork it or switch to KDE.
Or you could use Vmware or VirtualBox and run both at the same time.
I don't think anyone can justify 85% profit. Microsoft is a monoploy and if the stupid republicans hadn't chickened out, it would have gone the way of AT&T.
Fast, cheap, good: pick two.