Mod parent up - I'm out of points!
Every order has an intent on being filled. If a trader or another HFT happens to catch the price when it's flashed on for a micro second, then a trade takes place. Just because it's cancelled doesn't mean there was no intention to trade.
HFT aim to test the market to capture sentiment and psychology. Other traders and HFT are not provoked - they trade however their mind or algorithm sees fit.
I'll probably be modded down for being counter consensus but so many delight in crying foul when they don't understand a concept.
The markets bring together buyers and sellers (who would have thought!). It just so happens that a group of math and programming whizzes know how to capture the minor fluctuations in market sentiment.
Human day traders (attempt) to make a living out of playing the bid/ask game but usually their volume is so minute that it has almost zero bearing on liquidity. Markets need liquidity to avoid gapping - when spreads become large and there is a disconnect between buyers and sellers. Volatility is exacerbated by a lack of liquidity.
As for the scam nonsense, attempting to profit on capital markets is a perfectly legitimate form of business. No body was swindled. Most people cannot program for HFT and therefore think it is hocus-pocus, with amoral corrupt businessman profiteering at the 'expense' of the rest of us. All they're doing is capturing volume at a faster rate than human traders. Most investors aren't interested in short time horizons - they make investment decisions independent of how quickly they can turn a stock - they simply limit a price, form an expectation and sell when they deem fit (e.g. for the price hits a target, some event happens, etc).
If HFT are spewing out thousands of orders a second - let them. It's up to other HFT to adjust their parameters, or the exchanges to limit the number of orders to keep server integrity.
Despite popular belief - the markets don't function as casinos (though exceptions remain, a la China). Sentiment and expectations do run away, we only need look back at the 2008-09 crash. But that per se does not indicate a casino like behavior - it just means few people ever believed the world economy would tank as hard as it did.
The excoriation of HFT might be fun, but it's all for nought. They're making money and you're jealous. Tall poppy syndrome reigns supreme.
over a granny filmed in HD 3D.
I would take a 3D movie of a really cute girl over an SD movie of a granny any day.
That some directors retain artistic integrity and don't kowtow to the whims of movie executives.
I would like to cry out to would-be 3D obsessed directors: don't ever ever ever post-render another film in 3D when it was initially conceived in 2D.
My eyes - the goggles - zey do nuhsing!
You forget that the majority of people are not nearly as technical as the readers of this website. It's not difficult to envisage that the iPhone does almost everything that the general public wants. I can't speak for the rest of the U.S., but I get highly reliable voice calls in Manhattan and great data speeds on the iPhone 4.
The current Australian government is showing some startling and disturbing trends with their disapprobation for the rights to privacy. First there was Senator Conroy's (Minister for Broadband, Communications, etc) plan to retain a secretive government register, unbeknownst to the public, that would filter websites it deemed to have no classification. Child pornography was the chief motivator but like with so many other noble beginnings, it spawned into an ugly beast - a register with the capacity to capture (and did capture as we now know) websites ill-suited to blacklisting.
Now we have the Attorney-General seeking to deny privacy rights without public consultation. The very people who are affected the most by this policy are unable to comment due to a rather spurious argument that 'premature' debate might in some way affect the purpose of the policy.
There is something grossly wrong with this - if you want to snoop, spy or store data of citizens, by all means - but as a Government, you must get the consent of the population and be willing to accept rejection of said proposal. Silencing or blocking comment is in direct conflict of the notion of democracy.
Privately, I'd revile any Government where my information needs are suddenly in question. The adage 'if you don't have anything to hide, show it' fails - I should never be coerced to reveal anything about me without cause - that's privacy. Respect that.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?