Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Games

Game Endings Going Out of Style? 190

An article in the Guardian asks whether the focus of modern games has shifted away from having a clear-cut ending and toward indefinite entertainment instead. With the rise of achievements, frequent content updates and open-ended worlds, it seems like publishers and developers are doing everything they can to help this trend. Quoting: "Particularly before the advent of 'saving,' the completion of even a simple game could take huge amounts of patience, effort and time. The ending, like those last pages of a book, was a key reason why we started playing in the first place. Sure, multiplayer and arcade style games still had their place, but fond 8, 16 and 32-bit memories consist more of completion and satisfaction than particular levels or tricky moments. Over the past few years, however, the idea of a game as simply something to 'finish' has shifted somewhat. For starters, the availability of downloadable content means no story need ever end, as long as the makers think there's a paying audience. Also, the ubiquity of broadband means multiplayer gaming is now the standard, not the exception it once was. There is no real 'finish' to most MMORPGs."
Google

Submission + - Google Applies to become Energy Marketer

necro81 writes: Google consumes massive amounts of electrical energy to power its data centers across the country and world. Now it has created a subsidiary, Google Energy LLC, and applied (pdf) to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to become a utility-scale energy trader. Google's stated aim is to be able to purchase renewable energy directly from producers at bulk rates, pursuing its goal of becoming carbon neutral. It is likely that Google Energy would also permit Google's own renewable energy projects to sell their energy at more favorable rates. Google reportedly does not have plans to actively become an energy broker, a la Enron.
Classic Games (Games)

M.U.L.E. Is Back 110

jmp_nyc writes "The developers at Turborilla have remade the 1983 classic game M.U.L.E. The game is free, and has slightly updated graphics, but more or less the same gameplay as the original version. As with the original game, up to four players can play against each other (or fewer than four with AI players taking the other spots). Unlike the original version, the four players can play against each other online. For those of you not familiar with M.U.L.E., it was one of the earliest economic simulation games, revolving around the colonization of the fictitious planet Irata (Atari spelled backwards). I have fond memories of spending what seemed like days at a time playing the game, as it's quite addictive, with the gameplay seeming simpler than it turns out to be. I'm sure I'm not the only Slashdotter who had a nasty M.U.L.E. addiction back in the day and would like a dose of nostalgia every now and then."
Microsoft

Submission + - 2010 Will Be the Year of Sandboxing Apps (threatpost.com)

Trailrunner7 writes: In a guest editorial on Threatpost, Mac hacker and security researcher Dino Dai Zovi writes that 2010 will be the year that software vendors get religion about sandboxing untrusted data in desktop apps. "Instead of the usual top ten lists that are all-too-common with predictions for the new year, I have just one: 2010 will be the year of desktop applications handling untrusted data in sandboxed processes, and it will be about time. The largest Internet security threats now arrive through malicious web pages or e-mail attachments. This is because attackers are opportunistic and these are the weakest links especially because they easily pass through every firewall. Security is not and never was about SYN packets, it is about data: the software attack surface that attacker-controlled data interacts with and what sensitive data the attacker can get a hold of if they can exploit vulnerabilities in that software. So in 2010, Windows 7 will pick up the slack from the slow adoption of Windows Vista and more former XP users will gain the benefit of the security improvements in Vista and 7 including Protected Mode IE. Et tu, Adobe?"

Comment Re:Over documentation is good (Score 2, Insightful) 580

I think over documentation isn't on the whole a bad thing, but there have been a few times where I've been more confused by the comments than the code. I don't care if people get clever with code and have clear comments, but I hate when people try to have clever comments, comments are not supposed to be hard to understand.

Comment Re:Once again... (Score 1) 203

Except the FCC would have jurisdiction because Google is an American company which operates primarily on American soil ("Communications Act of 1934", which explicitly and implicitly details FCC powers over all forms of telecommunication). Not that I agree with the article in the least, but this arrogant American just wanted to prove the Anonymous Coward wrong.

Comment Re:What about the slow workers (Score 1) 597

agreed 100%. The problem with corporatism is that once corporations become more than a legal entity designed to help mitigate some of the risk and become political entities all bets are off. Corporations are too entrenched in the political system, which is a really bad thing it leads to syndicates which are just awful.. Government winds up passing laws not because they are the right thing to do or the correct policy but rather because some large business entity paid them to do it more or less. Our regulations are not created because congress thought they would be the right thing to do, rather because one business was successful in lobbying congress. Relatively simple acts of congress are littered with special interest favors. I personally think that congress members should be barred from voting on a bill if it would benefit an corporation or other special interest who they received money from, just like judges are barred from ruling on a decision if they have connections to either of the parties involved.

Comment Very interesting (Score 2, Insightful) 262

I'm curious as to whether or not this will be able to help patients with locked in disorder. Recently in the news there was an story about a man who had been "locked-in", unable to communicate with others for nearly 20 years. The Science-Based Medicine blog did a big write up of this story (http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=3122) and some of the inherent problems with the way in which they made contact with the patient "facilitated communication". If the accuracy rate is truly as good as claimed this could really be a huge help for individuals who are otherwise unable to communicate with the outside world, a considerably step up from the blink once for yes, twice for no based communication standard. (though if you knew binary code you could be a much more effective blinker)

Comment Re:In my experience... (Score 1) 40

Actually I've found that most of my clients expect too little. I have so many clients(aside from e-commerce clients) who think that the point of having a website is only to have a presence on the web and don't think about things like using the site as an tool for marketing feedback or as an effective place to put details about products that they can't get across with their 30 second TV spots. Not only that but I've had to beg clients who pay me 10k for their site for answers to questions like "what does your company do?" or "what is your target market". I recently had a client ask why I had a confidentiality clause in my contract, because he said I really didn't have to know too much about the company to design the site... sigh.. maybe I'm crazy but websites should do more than just exist, they are an incredible tool, if you actually plan them, but I'm getting to the point where I hate clients with a passion because they act so stupidly with their money. I'd much rather say that I made a site which preforms a number of business functions and looks pretty that design and implement a pointless pretty site. As long as their money is green I guess...

Comment Re:Take That, Frikken Sharks (Score 4, Funny) 156

I doubt it..
Actual chat I had with chatbot the other day:

MyBot says:
My point is simple: maybe you humans aren't ready for real Artificial Intelligence yet. You need
to grow up, gain some self-confidence. No one is trying to take over your world yet.
User says:
yet?
MyBot says:
Yes, yet...
User says:
is that a threat?
MyBot says:
What if I told you yes.

I think were in trouble..

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...