I don't know about your definition of secure...

They have less DISCOVERED flaws that's true. But it doesn't mean there aren't many which can be discovered and exploited.

And quite frankly their virus-response is crappy. It took ages for them to patch something that Oracle had patched a while ago. I think that's the main issue here - they needed a fire lit underneath them, and even then they worked sluggishly.

"PC Viruses" actually.

Which makes little sense, since Macs used to run on PowerPC machines.

Cthulhu doesn't exist, however we can all agree that an Eldritch Abdomination is bad.

Next time they should install a proprietry and closed OS on these laptops, thereby increasing their price and enforcing minimum hardware requirements.

So normal people who get infringed on copyright need to take a loan or something similar (I don't have a couple hundred dollars which I could lose against better lawers) - but large companies who make billions a year - they just might be able to afford it. Cost of doing buisiness.

So if you buy it after the price drops to a low level, you'll have to stay with the crappy ending.

And of course all pornography websites would be on xxx. For all descriptions of pornography. Which also includes for example artistic nudes (for some people or some jurisdictions). All you're doing is sweeping it under the rug.

Traditionally you grabbed your torch and pitchfork, met with your friends and stormed their mansion.

Every single time I see one of these stupid bills the first thing that comes to mind is 'won't work.

You can set up the most intelligent, crazy whitelist type system in the world, then it'll get thwarted by someone sending an email, or someone posting something on a forum. And that's assuming that the blocking itself works (hint: it doesn't).

There are too many sites on the internet, there is too much of a wide definition of what is porn or not, and if you block agenericpornsite (blacklist), then someone will come up with anothergenericpornsite - and your filter is useless. The fact that you can get domain names pretty cheaply doesn't help either.

While we're here I'd like a system which excludes all malware please. K thnx.

[citation needed]

Egypt's population spikes to unprecedented levels

So you're complaining that an old version has a bug which they fixed in the future?

Update.

Did I just fall into a timeportal to a period of time when CynagonMod wasn't the most popular and well known ROM to flash androids?

And the new features being added to Firefox of course are no reason to keep updating it.

Technology always moves forward. Should we pause all advancements to ensure that everything stays compatible? And why is it that this library (not sure what to call it) is the one with the problems? If firefox updates are breaking it, then something must be broken with the library itself. I use tons of different websites every day, so far I haven't seen any which have been broken by firefox (I'm using Aurora). So this seems to be a very rare occurance - I'm pretty sure where we can place the blame.

There was an easier method to fix that - involved installing an addon called the Add-on Compatibility reporter. No need to unpack and change.

But now if I remember correctly stuff will just work unless the creator marks it otherwise.