Comment Call the WTO, the IMF, the marines! (Score 4, Funny) 353
This is a restriction of trade. If we can force people to buy tainted beef and GMO foods, surely we can beat this.
This is a restriction of trade. If we can force people to buy tainted beef and GMO foods, surely we can beat this.
You know that you are perfectly welcome to live your heterosexual, monogamous life as you wish. You may not however dictate how others must live theirs. They have all the same rights to all the same benefits you are entitled to.
If you want to outlaw pot, then I want to outlaw farting in public and garlic/onion breath. I'll have to assume you have the same feeling about tobacco smoke, car exhaust, and napalm.
You got it all sideways. Nobody is forcing you into a homosexual marriage or to get an abortion, only that you respect people that do if you wish to be called a human being.
The Egyptian army does seem to be reflecting the will of the Egyptian people in this case.
Wag the dog... It's the same bit of manipulation as 'Arab Spring'... The 'will of the people' put Morsi (Mursi?) into office
If a dead guy can beat Ashcroft, there's always hope. Even Zombie Reagan can score a few...
Actually, I'm on your side, on Federalist grounds, that the DOMA was daft.
That qualifier completely and utterly eviscerates all meaning from that statement. In fact, they are in direct opposition.
I also have precisely zero confidence whatsoever in that piece of work Holder, or the Voting Rights section of the DOJ, and concur with Thomas' remarks on that decision.
That only means you're still a fish who doesn't know what water is.
Thanks for confirming, morals are personal, a way to live your own life, and that you really do appeal to authority in so easily rationalizing its abuse.
But you're so damn intolerable of anyone who disagrees with your narrow world view???
No no, that's not true at all. I have a very 'wide stance'
...are immoral.
to you, as dictated by your upbringing, hardly universal by any means.
And please explain how something is ethical without being moral.. Is it only by the absence of your deity?
Sure, reverend, whatever you say.
Anthony Perkins then?
Better than Obama and certainly better than Romney.
Ron Paul is an idiot, in the figurative sense of course, since he's done very well for himself. And I've always maintained that we have our rights to uncontaminated natural resources. With freedom goes respect. The merchant/political class will never understand that. The only necessary step is to revoke their (and everybody else's) privileged status.
It would, except that most people are not hermits. Some of us like to be with others and enjoy their company. And we don't don't insist on liberties that harm others. It's the authorities who demand that, for their own personal pleasures.
Fascism is not soft. Totalitarianism is not soft.
Of course it is. It's the 'new pragmatism'. Remain complaint and meet your quotas, and you will feel nothing but velvet. Speaking of which, who would you vote for president? Dennis Hopper, Jack Nicholson, or Anthony Hopkins?
No, that's the goal of our purely animalistic authority. The goal of liberty, libertarian, and liberalism is to allow people to live and die in peace.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker
