Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Encrypted stickers (Score 1) 79

On the opposite, telegram client is not bloated, it is one of the few apps that i find is done right, and very lightweight. Even linux desktop version.
As for phone number - it's only used as login id (unless you intentionally share it with someone), you can use it for years, without anyone knowing your phone number. Also, it is not intended to replace signal, or be more secure, it's designed with reasonable security for the masses. And as comment below says - you still need phone number for signal

Comment Encrypted stickers (Score 2) 79

Why would you ever want to encrypt stickers?

While I agree that building strong encryption into base system is good, and having stickers is good - it is simply not worth the development effort to encrypt stickers.

Compared to Telegram - they have strong 1-on-1 encryption, while groups are only device to server encrypted, i wish for something intermediate to exist - group encryption, while having authorized (encrypted) bot API should be better work direction.
Also don't underestimate the look and feel of native client. Much better to focus development on having native lightweight client (again, look at Telegram, it's amazing) - and you will get large userbase, even without having encrypted stickers.

Comment Re:Automated source tools (Score 1) 96

While it negates some of logging and access control, there are valid use cases for it.
If i need to test multiple commands involving long similarly looking filenames, i use mc, which allows faster filename copying, and generally is much more comfortable than pure shell. Sorry, but i don't want to TAB-complete for 20 pages of filenames, mc provides me that way easier.

Comment Re:USB-based standards are defective by design (Score 2) 178

MicroB was terrible design, as i am harsh with my equipment, i was basically changing cables every 2 weeks, and port of the phone at least every 3 months (constant charging on the go, and usually getting cable stuck in door). USB-C is huge improvement - in 2 years i have 2 cables that are not good for data anymore, but still good for charging, no broken ports.

Comment Re:what's the better connector? (Score 1) 178

Nobody forbids apple making C connectors from titanium/gold. If one manufacturer starts doing that, several will follow

There is loss/benefit ratio for both options, but i agree that having universal charger for all phones would benefit users in long term.
Of course concern about innovation is perfectly valid, and law should have expiration date when EU should review new proposed standards and adopt new if there is improvement

Slashdot Top Deals

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...