Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Punishment (Score 1) 347

^Citation please.

We have punishment EVERYWHERE. And it's pretty evident it works.

Want to park wherever you want? Don't care if you get a ticket? Ever just park in the middle of the street?

Want to drive however you want? Ignore the center line, stop signs and lights?

Drive without a license? Why bother with all that nonsense?

That's just driving. Punishments do work. Maybe don't turn to the most extreme examples to prove your point. Anyone could do any of the things I mentioned above, but generally don't.

Comment Re:Big unstated question (Score 2) 157

As someone who rides close to 16k km a year, a high performance tire (say Conti 5000) lasts around 5000km. That's assuming there's no damage, which also occurs quite a bit. I've had tires with just a few 100 km and a slash from road debris rendered useless. This might be less of an issue with this design as well.

Comment Re:Anecdotally, they eat a bad diet in India too (Score 1) 194

Right, which is why vegans, who typically eat lower amounts of saturated fat, and lots more carbs, have skyrocketing rates of CVD.

Not.

Funny how those who consume no cholesterol have among the lowest rates of CVD.

What is CVD? It's a bloodstream blockage made of...cholesterol. How are fats transported in the body? Through blood.

Fill your blood with fats, and they form blockages.

Reduce those fats, and you get far fewer blockages, or even reverse the condition (which has been done over and over on a low-fat vegan diet. No drugs needed.)

This is a bit over-simplified, but if you're not dumping those fats in your body, they can't be blocking your bloodstream. It's pretty much impossible to get CVD eating this way (short of some weird genetic disorder.)

And just as a side note, endurance athletes like cyclists eat a HUGE proportion of carbs, like 70%+. Again, if carbs were the problem, they'd been keeling over en masse.

Comment Re:G+ failed (Score 1) 175

FWIW I kinda liked G+. It made it really easy to choose who to see, with different lists, etc.. It had a great browser interface, which is a big plus for me (ha!) Also overall I'm a fan of Twitter.

I'd say Threads is becoming a bit of a nuisance already, because you can't control who you see. There's just a 'timeline'. Not of who you're following, but of 'everyone'. If you're seeing something you don't want to, your only option really is to 'mute' accounts, which is a crappy way to go about this. But otherwise there's just random posts coming up in your timeline, most I have little interest in.

Another odd thing is that it's not terribly easy or intuitive to read the comments on posts/threads, which I kind of feel like should be a bigger feature of this. Due to this, I think it ends up a bunch of people commenting, but never really seeing what others have commented..so it's often just the same comment over and over.

Those are a few of the shortcomings I've encountered so far, it's got that new social media smell which is kind of fun, but I'll admit I'm starting to lose interest already.

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...