It's known that ISPs sell browsing history to the government, would you expect that that means you personally can go buy it? Of course not

Snaps being defailt for ubuntu programs (firefox) actively gets in the way of maintaining the progam without using the snap version. Firdfox profiles get messed up every ubuntu version update. I gave up and switched to brave on that machine

Neither side of the uniparty is in favor of representative government.

with their pied piper campaign strategy.. so why should I care about her opinion on elections?

Even robots will be more humane than CEOs, guaranteed. Next we just need a robot board of directors.

At least the "MAGA" politicians voted against one of the state department's adventurous projects in accordance with the will of their voter base. The dem voter base isn't for it either, but that won't stop the dems from pushing it at the expense of everyone except (ironically) Russia. Neither party represents anyone but at least the repubs don't pretend about it.

So maligning someone is against the law, but if you're not saying anyone was maligned in this case, why are you even posting? That is as meaningful as if someone being accused of theft, and you showed up just to aay THEFT IS ILLEGAL! Yeah, great job. Obviously you are defending the circumstances of charging the person while (as you admit) not knowing what is true in the case and deferring to the court. You can't have it both ways, so just be honest.

"The right to free speech is not a license to spread misinformation and lies, especially if they transgress on someone else's reputation and rights. I am not saying whether the accusation is correct or not"

But you just agreed with the premise that the person is "spreading misinformation and lies".. so yes, you did support the accusation. Based on what you've said, I don''t doubt that you were one of the people in support of corporations censoring "covid misinformation", "Russian disinformation", etc.
  The IQ room temperature must be pretty low that this was upvoted.

The "principles" of freedom, where your biometrics are treated as a commodity to move around in someone else's money market? From the country that brought you Afghanis selling their own organs for money so they can eat, we bring you: Worldcoin!

And because it's all free market forces setting the precedent that we don't own our own biometrics, then it's all good! Or if the TSA did it first, then it's all good.

Surprisingly, you manage to look more and more like a plant with everything you say.

Imagine framing as "innovation" the practice of exploiting starving people for their biometrics in return for your shitcoin. You worldcoin people are such ghouls.

It's got what fuel cells crave!

If you are being sarcastic, I don't think you realize, apps like Telegram are in many cases censored if you get them from the app store or the google play store. For example, you can't get to RT's channel on Telegram unless you downloaded it standalone.

Let me paraphrase that for you: "Even Mitch McConnell believes in maintaining empire!" Is he supposed to stand for the veracity of maintaining empire? He's not a very appealing representative for anything, let alone the ruling class.

Now he'll just have to fill a house with popcorn kernels and o pop them all.

If it's all about our convenience, then why is google forcing them on us? You don't think there is any motive for something they planned several years ago?