"I take it you've never been Black, right?" Deeply offensive question. I will not submit to your racial profiling.

"And you've also never heard of 'Stop and Frisk'."
Yes I have and I think it is unconstitutional ... so do many judges "On August 12, 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the stop and frisk practice was unconstitutional".

If your constitutional rights are being infringed then you need to fight for your rights. The way you do that is no through violence but to insist on your rights every time. Even if the police say it is constitutional, you state that it is not and that you do not submit and you record it. AND THEN YOU LET THE LAWYERS BATTLE IT OUT.

1. They should have refused to comply with the search on the grounds of unconstitutionality.

If the police insisted then they would be forced to make an arrest. Then the three should insist on using the legal representation, the representative will ask why they are under suspicion and force the police to obtain a proper warrant etc...

In reality though, as soon as they refuse to submit to the unconstitutional search, the police will either walk away or be forced to commit a serious infringement, which can be dealt with later.

2. They did not start recording the police themselves as soon as the police approached them. That way they have on record their refusal to agree to a warrantless search which renders any search before arrest unconstitutional, and if they make an arrest then they need to have a good reason - which the story implies they did not.

When you start recording you should say to your friend, or the officers if you are alone, "this is being uploaded automatically to my blog, so don't worry if they try to delete the video". If you are smart then your friend will reply "did you press the live upload button" and you will check and say "yeah, it is uploading now" - or something like that. That will put the pressure on the officers to behave themselves.

If you can afford it, then actually do set yourself up to upload the feed automatically, but the threat alone is likely to be enough.

Always remain calm and speak politely. Be nice. Be friendly. Do not use hostile body language. Do not scowl. You cannot scare the police, they are not old women walking down a dark alley. I know that blacks think that they can scare anybody with a dirty look, but honestly, the police LOVE IT when somebody becomes aggressive - because it will give them grounds for arrest. They are trained to deal with your aggression and you play into their hands when you become aggressive. THEY WANT YOU TO BECOME AGGRESSIVE SO THAT THEY CAN ARREST YOU, SO DONT DO IT!

If the police turn a blind eye to google cars scanned at 10MPH over the limit, then they must also turn a blind eye to normal drivers too. So the speed at which people drive on average will rise by 10MPH.

But then the google cars will, for safety reasons, sometimes have to go 10MPH faster than those cars i.e. 20MPH above the official limit... Okay, so the police accept this and also must allow normal driver to go 20 MPH faster...

Where does it end? ....

In the crash barrier I think!

Your comment is too poorly written to grasp what your point is. Please take the time to restate your point more clearly.

Yes, we do.

Would it be acceptable for one website to decide never to show a picture of or mention in a good light, a black person?

Probably if one website did ithen that would be okay.

What if all of the major websites decided to do it?

Still okay?

What if we discovered that the KKK had decided to purchase control of all major media outlets with the purpose of making sure that there are no "good stories" about blacks and their images are never shown?

Still Okay?

A group of blacks decide to try to start their own media company to counter this. Because after all, it is a free market. So they look into it. Oh, the KKK have already all become billionaires from their media investments and have made the barriers to entry very high for starting your own company. They have also lobbied the government using their billions, supporting candidates who agree with KKK and tarnishing those who do not, and have had many "regulations" introduced which raise the barrier to entry even more. In order to start a media company you will now require at least $1M of legal advice, to somehow convince the advertising agencies (who are by now fully stocked with pro KKK people) to fund your new media station, etc....

STILL OKAY!?

http://thezog.info/list-summar...

But what if all of the private media companies are controlled by a group of people who share a common politic and decide to block, say, criticism of the Jewish State and to promote, say those who paint the Jewish State in a good light?

e.g.
http://thezog.info/list-summar...

Do this not become censorship at some stage?
 

The problem with libtards is that they refuse to ever be sensible about anything. It is their sneaky corner-casing which jams up the law books and stifles progress.

We are talking about the censoring of making comments about a certain topic. If you go down the line of saying that it is okay for private companies to decide which topics are acceptable and then make it so that the only or major method to discuss topics is through private companies and allow one group of people to dominate in those companies then when the private companies decide to block topic xyz you certainly do have censorship.

Here is censorship in action. The reason why the "reporting" on the recent murder of thousands of civilians including babies and children by the Jews was presented in a way that makes it sound as though it was the babies who were attacking the Jews:
http://thezog.info/list-summar...

This is long overdue.Thank god for the censorship which will shape our future.

FYI it is interesting to see how much the libtards want to bury my message, and how many others want it displayed:

Comment Moderation
sent by Slashdot Message System on Tuesday August 19, 2014 @12:05AM
Re:Oh yes..., posted to Ebola Quarantine Center In Liberia Looted, has been moderated Insightful (+1).

It is currently scored Normal (1).

Re:Oh yes..., posted to Ebola Quarantine Center In Liberia Looted, has been moderated Troll (-1).

It is currently scored Insightful (0).

Re:Motive?, posted to Ebola Quarantine Center In Liberia Looted, has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Normal (1).

Re:Oh yes..., posted to Ebola Quarantine Center In Liberia Looted, has been moderated Flamebait (-1).

It is currently scored Troll (-1).

So unoriginal, posted to Microsoft's Windows 8 App Store Is Full of Scamware, has been moderated Interesting (+1).

It is currently scored Normal (1).

Re:Oh yes..., posted to Ebola Quarantine Center In Liberia Looted, has been moderated Informative (+1).

It is currently scored Troll (0).

No. I never post anon until I run out of of posts for the day.

It is funny how up until the point that I started to write the truth about Gaza and race issues that my karma went over night from "funny" to "bad" which means that I am not allowed more than 10 posts a day. But the libtards, who are marking each other up all the time still have a karma which allows them to post their version of events all day long.

It just goes to show: If you want to know what a "liberal" thinks about free speech, say something his boyfriend disagrees with and you will find out from his lawyer!

The karma issue on /. is one of the reasons why you get skewed impression of how people actually feel about "taboo" issues such as Jewish Supremacism and Race. They have more people lined up who want to stop a debate by marking "troll" every time they disagree with something than we do - because we believe in debate and they do not. So they close us down, but we do not close them down. Which leads to skewing in the opinion on /. (not that it is not already skewed due to self-censorship).

Google have their stupid "store", Apple have their stupid "store", Microsoft have their stupid "store". These companies try to force you to go through their stupid "store" for everything. Even free things. You just want to download something and they force you to create a store account and verify with some kind of tracking like a phone number because god forbid that you can upgrade Notepad these days without the FBI receiving a notification.

In my opinion, these companies have completely lost the plot. They have started to change things for the sake of change, probably because they employ too many people and those people have to create things for themselves to do. Their latest thing is "store". Using computers was easier, less frustrating and more fun when we did not have the "store".

Hey they are exactly the same as us, okay. It is only their skin color that is different. They evolved in a different environment which gave them a different skin color, but it could not possibly impact their IQ or anything like that, because IQ is fixed and the same for all people - it is the one thing that did not evolve and would not be impacted at all by different environments. Okay? Got it? If you say otherwise then you are a racist and want to holocaust 6 gazillion poor innocent Jews who have already almost been holocausted, again!, by Hamas rockets.

The reason they behave so badly is because we oppressed them. White people are to blame for all of this. We are so evil. Thank god for the white genoc... I mean, for diversity.

"Or we could just blame it on race, because that's easy, and stupid people like easy explanations, no matter how wrong they are."

Okay. It appears that there is some evidence, apart from the overwhelming evidence of the crapness of black countries and black areas within white countries, and the really clever game of wit and brain that blacks invented called "knock out game", or the one where they set themselves on fire for fun, that blacks have higher testosterone and that high testosterone is not conducive to "civilisation" or to "being civilised".

Civilisation could only rise once testosterone levels fell, according to "Science",
http://science-beta.slashdot.o...

"Serum testosterone levels in healthy young black and white men.

This report gives the results of assays of circulating steroid hormone levels in white and black college students in Los Angeles, CA. Mean testosterone levels in blacks were 19% higher than in whites, and free testosterone levels were 21% higher. Both these differences were statistically significant. Adjustment by analysis of covariance for time of sampling, age, weight, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and use of prescription drugs somewhat reduced the differences. After these adjustments were made, blacks had a 15% higher testosterone level and a 13% higher free testosterone level."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pu...

But if you have limited resources to carry out the tests and interviews then you would be better off throwing away all of the non-blue-eyed candidates straight away and only interviewing the population that you know contains a greater density of fast reaction times.

"what part of there is no group of genes which can be usefully used to identify race did you miss?"
Well what part did you miss?

http://www.eupedia.com/europe/...

Also see other pages on that site which show other groups. The point is that using an individual's DNA you actually can assign him to a group of humans distinct from other groups. Those groups are called "races" and they do correspond roughly with the groupings that one would naively make "by eye and ear". Yes, there are some overlaps and grey areas, but our knowledge of DNA is extremely limited so it would be a mistake to assume that we already know everything about it.

see also:
http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-...

http://davidduke.com/are-jews-...

On the one hand some believers in Evolution as the origin of species will have it that all organisms are constantly "evolving", and that would have to include the development of all kinds of intelligence, aptitude, etc..., but on the other hand they want us to believe that Black Africans and Whites and Chinese people and Indians could not possibly have begun to develop separately in these traits and thus arrived in the modern age with a differential between them, which defines race, due to their differing environments, and that in fact we must all be exactly the same, as though we were not in fact separated and subjected to different environments for at least tens of thousands of years!

They have deeply misled and confused themselves to the point where their illogic is so obvious that people are afraid to question it. Like when a Professor of Mathematics insists that 1 + 1 is 3. People are just afraid to call them out and say: Hang on. That makes no sense. That is in fact, nonsense.

Same species, different race. Is it really that hard to understand? It is exactly as predicted by the theory of natural selection / evolution - so what is the big deal? You take a homogeneous population and separate it and subject different parts to different environment for a long time and then you end up with the parts being identifiably different to each other. Why is that so hard to agree with? It is exactly the theory of Natural Selection / Evolution.

White people are different to black people are different to Chinese people are different to Indian people due to the process of natural selection/Evolution. Same species, different race. They have not diverged to the point where they can no longer breed, hence they are the same species, but they have evolved to the point where they look and behave differently. They have evolved to the point where as groups (on average - it is a bell curve, some blacks are more intelligent or less physically able than some whites, but in general the test scores paint a certain picture psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushtonpdfs/race_evolution_behavior.pdf) they are more or less suited to different physical, cultural and social environment and will react differently to the same opportunities and will vary in their ability to capitalise on such opportunities.

Blacks tend to have more testosterone:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3455741

Which makes them less apt to create a civilisation:
http://science.slashdot.org/st...

Does it mean we need to hate each other? No. Does it mean we cannot all live on the planet? No. But that does not take away from the obvious fact that race does exist. It is astonishing that a white man can walk up to a black man and tell his Chinese friend to inform the Indian that race does not exist.

Black people (outside of the US where they have received propaganda/indoctrination which is opposite to the truth), Chinese people, Indian people, most do not have a problem with the fact of the existence of race. It is only a tiny bunch of idiot whites (libtards) who are walking around saying such stupid things. They have all succumb to the indoctrination which has taken hold like a parasite in our society and which is intent on the destruction of the white race. Nasty people like Barbara Spectre are behind this indoctrination:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ

See more results of Barbara Spectre's attack on the white race here:
whitegenocideproject.com/

And yes, Diversity = White Genocide.