Comment Re:Out of curiosity. (Score 1) 250
You'd really just need your gateway router to do NAT for you. We could reserve a
You'd really just need your gateway router to do NAT for you. We could reserve a
Why would that traffic get past the router? Why wouldn't that be internal traffic, and tunneled if it needs to go over the Internet?
There's a lot more to RFC 1918 space than 192.168/16. You're forgetting 10/8 and 172.16/12 completely here.
Honestly, though, if the whole public Internet refuses to route any IPv4 at all, then all IPv4 could be used at every installation behind that 6-to-4 bridge. There's no shortage if each private network can have 4 billion addresses. Anyone who needs to route directly without NAT in your scenario could just do the right thing and use IPv6.
Interesting you think career DoD people support a man over a nation state to which they've dedicated their careers.
As I said, he's a stupid fucking fascist tool and his motives here reflect that. Removing the copyright extensions is I imagine the only piece of policy regarding anything anywhere on which he and I would agree. The reasons for doing so are different, because I am not a stupid fucking fascist like Josh Hawley.
Josh Hawley is a stupid fascist fucking tool and his motives reflect that. I can't argue with returning some common sense to copyright limits, though.
Absolutely. The location and victims and the fact that it happened are newsworthy. The name of the person attacking is nearly irrelevant to public discourse except to sensationalize all the neighbors saying how quiet he was and his aunties saying he was such a good boy. Stop giving them the notoriety they crave, and it might prevent a couple of future attacks by someone feeling marginalized and anonymous.
I still have my 2000 and the Video Toaster for it (but not the drive array for the Toaster). I'd be interested in a mini version of an Amiga that hooks up to a USB keyboard and mouse, but I may as well just use UAE.
Look at productivity vs real wages and you'll realize that the "union nonsense" has been a long time coming. The top 1% have reaped almost all the gains for FAR too long and now that the baby boomers are retiring there's a labor squeeze and the working class realizes that there's a once in several generation chance to seize back some of the gains for themselves. I'm sure that will lead to some further automation, but that was going to happen anyways as the technology developed (ie I've never seen a management type say we shouldn't implement this automation because it might cause someone to lose their job, quite the opposite) so getting some wage concessions now while the capitalists don't have much choice is the obvious good move.
Two clients downloading from Steam will easily saturate 2Gbps, if you've got a backup client on a few machines you can also easily saturate your upload bandwidth doing your backups. I mean sure, if all you want to do is browse the web and watch videos (even 4k), then it's massive overkill, but there's plenty of existing use cases where it will be useful at least some of the time, and if more people had the bandwidth there'd be even more since information is like a gas that expands to fill whatever container is available.
We've been told for years that having no laws and no regulations was a good thing, and that access equals ownership. So if these people have access, therefore have ownership, how could they steal what they own? Perhaps lessons like this will teach cryptobros why we have laws and regulations around money and other property, if they're capable of learning that and willing to do so.
Hmm, distributed cache with sub-ms latencies, I wonder if they borrowed any code from FSX for Lustre since that sounds a lot like Lustre to me =)
Holy crap, they implement a full machine stack into an image file and used that virtual machine to carry out an attack on the memory on the host machine, that is bloody brilliant, someone was paying attention in their assembler class =)
East Texas is not desert. You're thinking of west Texas. Texas is a sizable state with green hills, subtropical beaches, mountains, plains, swamps, and yes, desert. East Texas is places like Beaumont, Lufkin, Marshall, Tyler, Texarkana, and Nacogdoches. It's forest, swamp, small towns, farms, ranches, and farm-to-market highways. Yes, oil fields can still be relatively remote, but it's not like they said this is west of Midland or north of El Paso. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
In the early days of certain groups or technologies, those people would often amass in a group for something related. They'd purposefully not create their own group too early, as doing so would put a small number of people at risk of being told their posts were off topic in the larger, older group. The Perl language, for one, got a good deal of its early following by people posting solutions in Perl to questions in the shell programming groups. It wasn't a flame war with one side shouting down the other, but it absolutely was recruiting by exposing another group to ideas in their own realm on purpose.
Here is some counter pedantry on Anonymous Coward's absolute about possessives:
Here is some counter pedantry on Anonymous Coward's absolute about possessives.
Perhaps AC meant that possessive pronouns do not take apostrophes.
"I am, therefore I am." -- Akira