Ah, but Facebook isn't a software company, it's a data company. They don't sell software, they sell eyeballs. When the product is the community you build, the software isn't very important. Look at an actual software or integration (hardware and software) business and I think you'll see a drastically different approach to software design. Where I am it's practically law that you don't open an editor until you have requirements and have worked out a preliminary architecture. The requirements will change and the architecture will adapt to those changes, but what's faster: Reverse engineering a pile of kludges or looking at a design and saying "Oh, we need to make this change here."

I can't malign beer as a "lubricant" of sorts to get creative juices flowing when I'm trying to solve a problem (or to loosen me up to tumble down a mountain when I'm pretending to snowboard). But when actually programming? Hell, if I try to program after just one beer I only want to take a nap.

All that said, I still really love beer.

I don't think it's the alternative. I spent the last thirty minutes trying to find a definition (from my phone, since I don't think the boss would like me browsing Urban Dictionary as much as he likes me browsing /.). The first four links were to a website purporting to have a definition but directing instead to a link saying "You need to install our mobile app to look at our stuff." Pretty sure it's a marketting ploy to distribute that mobile app, since the rest of the links were people saying "Oh, and don't even *ask* about scrogramming."

I'll file that under Stuff I Am Better For Not Knowing.

Is there a "factually correct" mod we could give this guy? Capitalism is not without its faults, but I'm tired of the constant "Capitalism failed because I'm not rich" argument .

And then the whole battle got eaten by a grue!

Why you gotta hit me with them negative vibes so early in the... afternoon.

The truth is more onerous than that. The thing is, they *don't* want that. No major American company actually *wants* to wipe out the middle class. After all, who would you sell your products to if nobody has any money? Companies need a strong middle class and are well aware of that fact. Yet they still work to reduce wages as cost cutting measures for a temporary return. It's blatantly self-destructive behavior that everybody seems to be in on, aware of, wants to stop, but consistently take the wrong routes.

If there were a few guys up at the top in swivel chairs with fluffy cats going "mwaahahahaha" as they plot and scheme, that would be one thing. They could be stopped. How do you stop a society from marching over the cliff - fully aware the cliff is there, fully aware they don't want to fall off it, yet somehow not willing or able to stop themselves from doing it?

Good to see racism is alive and well in the modern age...

Fighting the immigrants is the wrong battle. I'd much rather have that Pakistani born programmer be working here as a US citizen - protected by US labor laws and paid a competitive US salary than be "on loan" under an H1-B visa which his employer can use to depress the wages of his other employees.

Full disclosure - I recently switched to a t-mobile pay as you go plan on an unlocked smartphone and have been happy with the coverage (though it's nowhere near as broad as ATT or Verizon).

Look into the MVNOs (Straight Talk or net10 or whomever) - there are more options than ATT, Sprint, Verizon, and T-Mobile.

Some do - I recall an episode of Voyager with some weapon that would essentially erase the target from existence (make it so it never existed). I don't recall if the episode was particularly great (it was Voyager, after all), but they did at least explore the butterfly effect in that way - and without using time travel itself. They'd used this weapon in a war and it had drastic personal consequences, so they kept trying to use it to correct the timeline. A moon here, an asteroid there, but any time they fixed one thing, something else would get unraveled.

There are good ones out there, but it's just too often done poorly. I don't know if it's writers that just don't grasp it or producers who shut down a lot of these ideas fearing the audience won't grasp it.

...Probably because you're still going for the same cell phone contract as you would be if you were getting a new phone? There are plenty of contract-free options out there at significantly lower cost if you look around a bit. The simple fact is, *most* people tend to replace their phone whenever they're eligible to. That's what the pricing is geared toward and why data plans are as expensive as they are. I'm sure the networks love folks who hang on to their old phones and old plans out of contract.

From TFS ('cause lord knows *I* didn't RTFA) it sounds like the exemption was on unlocking phones still under contract - implying that once the contract has expired the users would be able to do as they wish with their phone. Of course, the rest of what you say is right on, perhaps even a little optimistic. Subsidized cell phones are a horrible deal for the consumer who seem to love paying for "unlimited everything" even if a pay-as-you-go plan for a fraction of the cost will cover their use.

Seems to be right in line with the current American culture: Always need the newest phones, TVs, and cars - not because they do things their old equipment couldn't, just because it's the newest shiny.

More misses than hits in my opinion. Time travel *should* scare away more novice sci-fi writers than it does because more often than not, it's used as a cheap deus ex machina to introduce or resolve some part of the plot (like in the SG-1 season 8 finale, series finale, or *most* of Enterprise). If you want to explore time travel - explore it! Don't use it as a cheap gimmick to push along (or reboot!!) the story.

The more I observe, the more I come to the conclusion that all of politics is a tragic high school shouting contest. North Korea is just somebody's obnoxious eight year old brother that nobody wants to claim.