. Situation is actually very similar to ours.
Hyperinflation generally happens because the government lack the ability to properly tax the amount of resources that it needs/wants.
In Weimar that happened because the government had debt denominated in gold which it couldn't repay without taxing the economy to destruction.
In the US, the debt is not a real problem as pretty much all the debt is denominated in dollars. With a 1:1 ratio between printed currency and debt repayed that isn't really a scenario for hyperinflation.
If you want to bet on hyperinflation in the US, I would go either with failure of taxing regime (USSR collapse) or collapse in production capabilities (Zimbabwe) as being more likely scenarios for hyperinflation.
And if all the work is done by robots, a government is needed more than ever, because then there will be no more economic wealth redistribution through wages.
That is something I think most people don't get. Governments naturally grow to fit the size of the available labor force after the private sector has had its share. (when it doesn't, it is called austerity and is generally a bad bad thing)
Macroeconomically speaking, any government only has 4 options:
* Pay the unemployed (large government with entitlements)
* Employ the unemployed directly or indirectly (large government)
* Institute max working per week and other rules to increase number of employees in the private sector (shrinks government, grows private sector)
* Wait for inevitable collapse or civil war.
Whenever Marxists talk about economy they like to overstate the importance of labour and understate the importance of capital.
Umm, the whole concept of Marxism is basically based around technology causing capital to become increasingly valuable, eventually leading to the capital in a few private hands destabilizing the economy and society as a whole.
If all else fails, lower your standards.