Comment Re: Ugly Dashboard (Score 1) 192
Says the person who hasn't driven one recently... Your loss, but they really are nice cars now...
Says the person who hasn't driven one recently... Your loss, but they really are nice cars now...
Coke is selling emotions to the next generation... they sell sugar water, all they have are feelings...
No, the Fusion... an overlooked gem of a car. You can usually find mid level trim Fusions for $17k, or $250 a month on lease with nothing due at signing.
After buying gas, the Fusion is still cheaper to own.
No, that is indeed true... and the problem, gas cars are cheaper to buy and cheaper to run for the first 3-5 years which is all new car buyers care about.
Ahh yes, the features that turn it into a $55K car...
Fusions don't sell for anything close to MSRP, Tessa has to due to a lack of dealer network.
Note: If you doubt the $17K price, you haven't driven a Ford Fusion lately. What they sell for $17K is impressive.
There are several other under $20K cars nicely equipped that are as nice as this.
Dashboard is ugly and doesn't look very driver friendly, but taste is subjective so fair enough...
My problem is that it is expensive and not as green as Tesla claims, but they will sell...
For what I see there, $17,000 strikes me as the right price, Tesla has made progress, but not there yet.
Concord was loud taking off because it had 50 year old reheated turboramjet engines that were amazingly advanced for its day, but really shouldn't have been on a commercial airplane.
When it is the last time you flew on an airliner with afterburners?
You're trying to have a logic debate, I'm trying to explain how courts work in the real world, the two don't always match up.
I don't think I'd have a very hard time finding a jury of 12 people too stupid to get out of jury duty who would blame Apple for this.
Maybe, maybe not... have you don't the research to see if that has always happened everywhere?
I'd be willing to bet that you'd be surprised...
Wait until you find out how full of crap all the media really is...
Even politifact is often full of it...
No, it would not. It could be shown that Apple could or should have known that could happen and design the phone to not work with such chargers.
The liability might be split between the maker of the charger and the maker of the phone, or both could be liable.
Sooner or later a case goes to trial, a judgement is rendered and the appeals process is over, at which point paying is required.
You absolutely could sue the makers of the circuit breakers. Winning would be up to a court, but you would have standing to sue.
"I am, therefore I am." -- Akira