Yup we didn't need print magazines in the 80's. Because downloading images at 2400 baud and displaying them on your 8 color computer was vastly superior to full color printing and inexpensive monthly delivery.

I used to print out source to do code reviews, because I was too impatient to wait for VGA projectors to be invented.

I like it when my brakes stop me before I slide into something.
(I ride a motorcycle, I find riding in the rain to be unpleasant for a variety of reasons)

The why do they hire nurses to ensure physical safety in the workplace?

You really and truly have no clue what having a post means, do you?

Thanks for letting us know you have no idea what either means and instead you relieving yourself of the burden of ignorance, you just make fun of people.

The Cloud has specfic meaning, just like the internet of things.

You people are so short sighted.
And there are more things then people on the internet already.
See: Phones.

" your grandchildren (great or not) don't and won't,"
You're projecting, stop it. You may not giver a crap about the lives of you GP or GGP, but many people do care about their GP and GGP. Why do you think genealogy has such a huge amateur following?

Also, there are historian who wold like to archive specifically because you are a boring average person.

"for the rest you use a courier service."
Or spend less money with a higher degree of accuracy and use USPS.

"And the living address you get from where?"
Don't be a myopic ass.
http://www.whitepages.com/

No, I have every important email I ahve every gotten. And I've been getting them since before people used the @ symbol.
Not conveniently searchable. the last 8 years are the res you would need to open up with different tools.

Today, when you look at social media, most peoples writings are digital.

A lot of people care, and for different reasons.
Historians care, because traditionally average goings on in a society get lost.
Family cares becasue they want to remember.

evidence do you have to support the non-existence of a god ?

The fact that you typed that sentence tells everyone here you have no clue what science is, or how it works.

I really, really hope you are some neck beard troll laughing at how he got us. Because otherwise it means you are really, really., really stupid.

OR, he has new evidence. . . hahaha.
He doesn't, but as rational and critical think people, we need to look at any new scientific evidence. To be honest, I think we've covered and shown every pro-creationism argument to be false. but maybe has something new.

Riddle me this , Batman.
"by looking for the necessary and sufficient falsifiable hypothesis statement."
well, here are 6.
1) Visible Light strikes the earth. Falsifiable and tested.
2) When Visible light strike something, IR is generated. Falsifiable and tested.
3) CO2 is invisible to visible light. Falsifiable and tested.
4) CO2 absorbs energy from IR. Falsifiable and tested.
5) The amount of CO2 in the air exceeds what can be absorbed.Falsifiable and tested.
6) The Amount of CO2 in the air is rising due to human output.Falsifiable and tested.

So, where is the energy going? If it isn't cause the total energy trapps ot go up(heat) going up because of the excess CO2, it must be going somewhere. Well, where?
I look forward to you well tested and falsifiable paper that win you the noble prize for completely changing how we understand fundamental science.

You sir, are a fucking idiot. AGW is a solid science. As solid as chemistry.

The Unicode is wrong*. Technically, in English, there should be a space between each dot. So don't use 2026

*well, it's more technical then that but frankly I don't want to lay out the history of Unicode.

" the power of the Holy Spirit is proof of God's existence"
prove the Holy Spirit is real? ah, you can't. Hence Blind Faith.

Read this, then return and apologies to us by naming all you logical fallacies:
http://www.theskepticsguide.or...

Evolution makes predictions.
BTW: Learn the difference between making up stories and science. There is nothing made up in the science of evolution.

" it's more like detective work.
So is all science.

I hate that statement. It's a factually lie. We have science, we will know it's science based and we will figure it out.