Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What's so bad about little partying? (Score 1) 159

I thought that was hilarious, but as I was reading it, it seemed rather unlikely that someone could come up with that entire thing in time to be the first post. And of course, he didn't. Everything after the first paragraph is copied from someone named Dick Masterson, "the most chauvinistic man alive". http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/why-women-hate-sex/

Comment Re:Single source? (Score 0) 1014

This would require a mutation rate not unlike the Haggunennons of Azizatus Three. Their genetic structure, based on the quadruple-striated octo-helix, is so chronically unstable, that far from passing their basic shape onto their children, they will quite frequently evolve several times over lunch.

Comment Re:Not what I was expecting from the summary (Score 0) 369

I think you're right, but this is confusing and not explained well at all in the article. I had assumed the article was mixing up "plug" and "port," because it doesn't make much sense for the jack/port to be large enough to accept an existing plug - if you're trying to make it thinner by cutting the plug in half, you're not going to keep using a 3.5mm cylinder for the jack. I can't find the patent application with the illustrations, but it sounds like they're covering a bunch of applications including a jack that has large and small ports, small-port only jacks, and magnets in the large port hole to keep a half-plug held captive?

Comment Re:What's better consumer value? (Score 0) 425

I remember playing basically the same game on an Exidy Sorceror in the late 1970s. Launch the (rock|bird) over the wall to knock down a tower. There was no touch screen, so you had to manually type in your angle and velocity. But it's just an evolution of the same game. Sort of like Arkanoid was an evolution of Breakout. Both games held my interest for about 3 minutes.

Comment Re:Ridiculous study (Score 0) 482

Did you READ the article? It's not fear mongering, nor does it have anything to do with technology, or efficiency. At the historical growth rate, in 1400 years we will be consuming more energy than the Sun produces. There's no fear mongering there, there's no technology that will prevent it, it's a simple calculation. But, it does assume the rate of growth equal to the rate over the last 400 years.

Slashdot Top Deals

UNIX is hot. It's more than hot. It's steaming. It's quicksilver lightning with a laserbeam kicker. -- Michael Jay Tucker

Working...