From the rules page:

The following StarCraft bugs/tricks are permitted:

      1. Plague on interceptor
      2. Units pressed through
      3. Drops to defuse mines
      4. Mineral walk
      5. Manner Pylon
      6. Lurker hold position
      7. Observer over turret
      8. Stacking air units

All other bugs/exploits are forbidden. Bots caught attempted these exploits will be disqualified. This includes but is not limit to:

      1. Flying drones and templars
      2. Terran sliding buildings
      3. Stacking ground units
      4. Allied mines
      5. Gas walk, to get through blocked entrances or ramps

A player could feel more satisfied if it plays against a computer with the same knowledge and resources as a human player, because then it would have to play more like a human. With such cheats, the player will feel annoyed that the computer always attack when he is the weakest, without real knowledge, or can attack with twise the units he know is the maximum at a given time.

Well it depends on what you call a rush. If you compare a game like starcraft to AoE2, a zergling rush would be like a drush and ignoring feudal. As far as I know this is easily countered. The more reasonable rush in AoE2 is feudal rush, and thats more like 10 min into the game, and will not kill of the player directly. He would rather die when rams come out in castle at 15-20 min. Compare this to a zergling rush where a player can be killed in the first few minutes.

Sad thing the nukes are so underpowered in pro starcraft that they are only used as a humiliation. I hope nukes and other superweapons are better balanced in SC2.

Randomness is an obvious counter to this. So even before the AI knows anything about its opponent, it should cast a dice and rush fast at some percent of games as not to be predictable.

I wonder if the bots will have any restrictions on apm and such. I could imagine the terror of trying to defend against 10 individually controlled mutalisks harrasing all my expansions at the same time, from all directions. And without any long-range trapping mechanism, or fast air-to-air unit, there is no way to catch them. And if I need cannons or turrets or units at all angles of attack, I will certainly lose the macro battle.

Theres some more info at http://torrentfreak.com/google-removes-pirate-bay-frontpage-from-search-results-091002/. Including thepiratebay in a DMCA complaint seem to just be a mistake from some companies part.

For a single person a CD-R sure could include all the songs he/she felt relevant at the moment. I was thinking more of having a disc with so much music of different types that it could be handed to pretty much anyone in the world, and most would think it would fill their music needs. At 5TB and about one million tracks, its at least aproaching this.

Soon I may put all relevant music ever made onto a single disk. Internet filters wont have much effect then.

But is that specific to your cheap collective deal, or for all Bredbandsbolaget connections? I haven't had Bredbandsbolaget, but two of the other big providers, Telia and Comhem. If there was a cap, it was at least larger than the 500+ GB I've used per month, so I can't see why Bredbandsbolaget would have just a 100GB cap.

But the mere fact that one side does robocalling would be a big minus for me. Whether or not there are also joe-jobbing should be ignored, and if unsure you could check if they really do robocalls. Im not from america, how much robocalling where there prior to this rule change?

What kind of 20,000 student university still uses just a 100mbit line (or even less)? I'll go ahead and assume its not a technology oriented one. At my university there is a similar opt in if you need to use more than 60GB/month.

There are already alternatives like the one you mention, just buy a company type ADSL line. If you want a whole 3Mb/s garanteed however, it will cost you way more than you would like to pay for a home line. If the rates where unchanged, the garanteed speed would more likely be around 1% of peak speeds.

And it can also be made too strip the ads, even if it isn't its main purpose.

It wont make any difference as long as the compiler/mind knows that the second part can never conflict with itself.