Comment Re:yes, now it is (Score 1) 96
...just like when you drill to the center of the Earth....
You do that often?
...just like when you drill to the center of the Earth....
You do that often?
That's not a gigantic ancient impact crater. That's a gigantic ancient impact crater.
I always found spinach in food overrated. A few tasty bits in any dish is fine, but to eat an entire dish that was suppose to be spinach. I dunno I can't see myself enjoying it that much. Even if the spinach was quality and well prepared.
3) Large amounts of radioactive material fly out the back of the jet, contaminating everything in sight.
Because Nuclear carriers leave trails of large amounts of radioactive material in the ocean behind them, right? Thanks for the hippy FUD.
Even if you're not a Microsoft fan, you have to admit this is pretty frapped up.
Blended smooth with ice or inefficiently captured as a video file?
Had you RTFA you would have seen this:
Scientists at the time suggested that the night-shining clouds over London were made of meteoritic dust. But those aerosols are typically too small to reflect sunlight efficiently, Kelley argues, suggesting the clouds above Europe were made of ice crystals. This assumption, along with the new analysis of shuttle plume movement, strongly suggests that the object that blazed into the atmosphere and disintegrated above Siberia was a moisture-rich comet rather than a relatively dry asteroid.
Citation needed.
Easy enough to verify. Aaaaaand, nope. Only the shuttle's main engines use liquid oxygen/hydrogen. The boosters use a solid mixture and each one provides over twice the force generated by all three main engines combined (therefore it's safe to assume the boosters are expelling a significant amount of the total exhaust).
Neutrinos have bad breadth.