Comment Re:He Won! (Score 0, Troll) 467
I interpreted PDS as to be the affliction tormenting those who are so deranged as to think that Palin is anything other than an idiot.
I interpreted PDS as to be the affliction tormenting those who are so deranged as to think that Palin is anything other than an idiot.
First, reading comprehension. He didn't say that Apple doesn't invest in R&D. He just stated some assumption about what Microsoft does, and said "Apple does nothing like that." I think that statement is probably false, and probably a troll, but what you said is demonstrably false. And a troll
Second, don't be a jackass.
"Is my company alone in wanting to stay in the 1990s or is Window 7 the way forward?"
Uh... yes? no?
The OR version of "or" that computer scientists creates a question for which the answer provides little relevant information. The XOR version of "or" that is the popular meaning in spoken english has similar problems.
No idea? Why don't you tell us. Is the answer one, and one?
There is a University College that is part of Rutgers University. "University" and "College" are both words. They have meaning.
That this isn't done everywhere. With all the red light cameras everywhere (for safety), you'd think they could put a few out there that would make it so I don't spend 3 minutes every morning staring at an empty intersection.
It's a hash. Clearly there are better hashes that won't have the same result for RivenAleem and RovinBaleeeem.
We need a term to describe things which appear to be science but in fact which are not.
It's called FUD.
Just wait until all those humans start wearing the trademarked FRBR apparel.
I hope you are not presenting your anecdotal evidence as proof of your claim... because...it's not.
It's that jealous police officers like to arrest attractive innocent people.
Sure....that's bad, but how many football fields is it?
I would argue that a guy who writes code is a programmer. That is, someone who programs. Perhaps the term you're looking for is computer scientist?
Problems in NP are problems such that there is an algorithm where the first step is guess the answer, and to then perform the verification in polynomial time. That is not to say that a nondeterministic algorithm necessarily does this. There is no reason to believe that quantum computers can solve NP-complete problems.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer