Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Theoretically Achievable, Practically Impossible (Score 1) 1

If you are talking pure theory, and have infinite resources, I believe it is technically possible to perfectly duplicate the windows API (not sure about legal challenges). But if you had anything less than infinite resources, there will always be at least one obscure incompatibility because of the infinite ways all the pieces can interconnect. Just my opinion, no sources.

Submission + - If the WINE Project had a Billion Dollars 1

An anonymous reader writes: This is an open question to the smart folk on Slashdot: If WINE [winehq.org] had 100 times more developers, a billion dollars a month and access to all resources, would it be possible for them to create a product that is 100% windows compatible? Are there technical or legal challenges that are insurmountable no matter what they do, or is it simply a matter of hitting the moving target?

Comment Re:The only thing I got out of TFA... (Score 1) 320

I would also like to add apps: /apps /home /linux That way you can nuke /linux whenever you want and keep your apps. Also, often you have to mess around with config for apps, maybe copy in a plugin etc. No need for it to be mixed up with core linux. To take it a step further, it would be nice to completely get rid of /opt, /var, and other non-human oriented fragmentation that was only there to be able to partition them separately and enforce different computer-related rules.

Comment Re:Why would I want this? (Score 1) 1089

This is not your grandpa's thin client. Imagine you had your desktop exactly as it was, with the slight modification that it would back itself up silently to a server of your choosing. Then if you bought a new computer, or used someone else's computer, you could login into your account, have it rebuild/resume your saved state, allowing you to continue running your apps locally. Wouldn't that just be better in every way? That's where Google's going, and why they are pursuing something as costly are gargantuan as building an OS. Otherwise, they would just continue to build for the browser.

Comment Re:This recession is a good time to strike (Score 1) 1089

if Google has deep pockets, Microsoft's are even deeper.

Practically speaking, I don't think MSFT's pockets are deeper. Sure they make/have more money, but are they going to shutdown XBOX, Zune, Office, SQL Server, CRM and Exchange just to compete with Google? Mano e mano I'd say they have about the same amount of cash to burn.

Google

Submission + - Cache is King at Gogle Datastore (thinkloop.com)

Baz writes: "The Google App Engine (GAE) datastore has interesting characteristics...it takes the same amount of time to process a query against a recordset of any size, be it 10 or 10 million...Since it is based on utilization, every inefficiency costs real money — and depending on the degree of inefficiency, it could add up to orders of magnitude more money..."

Comment Re:Wow.... (Score 1) 410

The "escort service" fliers are all over the place.

Finding out whether an escort service is an "escort service" or not, is a costly and time consuming business. They get busted all the time, but the cops can't do 'em all. And by the time they finish busting one, two more pop up ready to take its place. Sound familiar?

Comment Baz (Score 1) 176

The way to think about it is to estimate the maximum amount the world is willing to pay NOT to LOSE their Linux. RedHat would pay at least half their worth (2.6B / 2 = 1.3B) to stop you from pressing the NukeAllKernels button. Cisco would pay at least a sixth of their market cap (109B / 6 = 18B). That's already almost 20B! How much would you pay to not have your Linux nuked?

Slashdot Top Deals

Remember to say hello to your bank teller.

Working...