As this is a PDF, here is the full answer:
"An open Letter to Jerry Coyne:
Dear Jerry,
Your distorted reading of my motivation for not releasing the video of our conversation
in Kentucky has given birth to an inordinate number of hostile letters to me. Because of
misleading statements on your website (11/1/2011), I have received a considerable
amount of hate mail, often laced with obscenities, though often also tempered with
inquisitive politeness. The mail mostly complains about my “cowardly” reneging on an
alleged agreement that you falsely assume I made to post online the video of our panel
at the University of Kentucky. When I was in Kentucky I was never asked to do so.
Later, after reflecting on what to me was a most unfortunate event I wrote to Prof Rabel
requesting that any video not be released.
Anyway, Jerry, your own words impute cowardice to me for this refusal, but how do you
know that’s the reason for my reluctance? Here is a typical reaction stirred up by your
remarks: “What a pathetic, sociopathic dweeb you are. Hiding behind your sick belief
system you call a religion. You are an insult to academia, and a dim bulb for the
uninformed masses. You deserve the insults you are getting and should be fired.
Coward, liar and fool you are, loser. And no doubt a Republican too!” (I’m tempted to
say that I can live with every accusation except the last.)
I want to make it clear that Rob Rabel at the University of Kentucky has confirmed that I
never gave permission before or after the panel to post the video. You need to make
this clear to your audience. I never broke the agreement that you have unkindly caused
your readers to assume I made.
However, the more interesting issue has to do with my reasons for refusing permission
to post the video, and whether it was wrong for me to do so. I have no regrets about
anything I had to say during the panel, and if you agree to post this letter on your site I
will be happy to have the video released unedited, for public scrutiny. Those who are
reading this blog are free to look at other videos of my comments on science and
religion available online. They will see that I have no need to hide my views from the
public, and in fact I am quite eager to have my thoughts made available provided they
are presented accurately and fairly.
Why then do I hesitate in this case? It has to do with you alone, Jerry, not anyone else,
including myself. I have had wonderful conversations with many scientific skeptics over
the years, but my meeting with you was exceptionally dismaying and unproductive. I
mentioned to you personally already that in my view, the discussion in Kentucky seldom
rose to the level of a truly academic encounter. I agree that it was probably entertaining
to the audience who gave us a standing ovation at the end. Nevertheless, instead of
being flattered by this I went away terribly discouraged at what had just taken place. I
wish to emphasize that I do not exempt myself from criticism."