Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not News for Nerds (Score 1) 399

Add to your observation, a society that is winding down opportunities to participate, other than the upper spectrum of the professional classes.

This Rahm move is the first stage of a grift. There will be introduced a whole new opportunity for private, post-academic life counseling "services" - similar to the "math training centers" for the aspirational.

The rest will be more effectively bound to a school-to-prison scheme, which will swell in volume and record commensurate record shareholder gains. "They didn't even want to graduate" after all. Now they are assembling small electronics for 5 to 10.

Comment Re:Add-ons (Score 3, Interesting) 129

It could correspond to an increased use of DuckDuckGo as a search engine default. DuckDuckGo typically includes a Wikipedia page in a feature box, next toits top-line search item, if a domain is typed in the URL bar without a TLD designator.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent....

Worth investigating.

Comment Re:MO (Score 1) 535

"Let's continue applying the remedy. Restrict basic human rights and assert more intrusive authority throughout the fabric of society. If this hasn't yet worked, it's that we have simply been too timid to apply the right measure of control. We will continue advancing this cause, until real safety is achieved for all."

It's a fucking joke, mate.

Comment CENSORED: US DoD World's Greatest Carbon Polluter (Score 2, Informative) 465

Winner of Project Consored top 25 articles for 2009 - 2010 news stories: Pentagon's role in global catastrophe

By Sara Flounders
 

In evaluating the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen -- with more
than 15,000 participants from 192 countries, including more than 100 heads of
state, as well as 100,000 demonstrators in the streets -- it is important to
ask: How is it possible that the worst polluter of carbon dioxide and other
toxic emissions on the planet is not a focus of any conference discussion or
proposed restrictions?
 

By every measure, the Pentagon is the largest institutional user of
petroleum products and energy in general. Yet the Pentagon has a blanket
exemption in all international climate agreements.
 

The Pentagon wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; its secret operations in
Pakistan; its equipment on more than 1,000 U.S. bases around the world; its
6,000 facilities in the U.S.; all NATO operations; its aircraft carriers, jet
aircraft, weapons testing, training and sales will not be counted against U.S.
greenhouse gas limits or included in any count.
 

The Feb. 17, 2007, Energy Bulletin detailed the oil consumption just for the
Pentagon's aircraft, ships, ground vehicles and facilities that made it the
single-largest oil consumer in the world. At the time, the U.S. Navy had 285
combat and support ships and around 4,000 operational aircraft. The U.S. Army
had 28,000 armored vehicles, 140,000 High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled
Vehicles, more than 4,000 combat helicopters, several hundred fixed-wing
aircraft and 187,493 fleet vehicles. Except for 80 nuclear submarines and
aircraft carriers, which spread radioactive pollution, all their other vehicles
run on oil.
 

Even according to rankings in the 2006 CIA World Factbook, only 35 countries
(out of 210 in the world) consume more oil per day than the Pentagon.
 

The U.S. military officially uses 320,000 barrels of oil a day. However,
this total does not include fuel consumed by contractors or fuel consumed in
leased and privatized facilities. Nor does it include the enormous energy and
resources used to produce and maintain their death-dealing equipment or the
bombs, grenades or missiles they fire.

 

Steve Kretzmann, director of Oil Change International, reports: "The
Iraq war was responsible for at least 141 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
equivalent (MMTCO2e) from March 2003 through December 2007. ... The war emits
more than 60 percent of all countries. ... This information is not readily
available ... because military emissions abroad are exempt from national
reporting requirements under U.S. law and the U.N. Framework Convention on
Climate Change." (www.naomiklein.org, Dec. 10) Most scientists blame carbon dioxide
emissions for greenhouse gases and climate change.
 

Barry Sanders in his new book, "The Green Zone: The Environmental Costs
of Militarism," says that "the greatest single assault on the
environment, on all of us around the globe, comes from one agency ... the Armed
Forces of the United States."
 

Just how did the Pentagon come to be exempt from climate agreements? At the
time of the Kyoto Accords negotiations, the U.S. demanded as a provision of
signing that all of its military operations worldwide and all operations it
participates in with the U.N. and/or NATO be completely exempted from
measurement or reductions.
 

After securing this gigantic concession, the Bush administration then
refused to sign the accords.
 

In a May 18, 1998, article entitled "National security and military
policy issues involved in the Kyoto treaty," Dr. Jeffrey Salmon described
the Pentagon's position. He quotes then-Secretary of Defense William
Cohen's 1997 annual report to Congress: "DoD strongly recommends that
the United States insist on a national security provision in the climate change
Protocol now being negotiated.http://www.marshall.org
 

According to Salmon, this national security provision was put forth in a
draft calling for "complete military exemption from greenhouse gas
emissions limits. The draft includes multilateral operations such as NATO- and
U.N.-sanctioned activities, but it also includes actions related very broadly
to national security, which would appear to comprehend all forms of unilateral
military actions and training for such actions."
 

Salmon also quoted Undersecretary of State Stuart Eizenstat, who headed the
U.S. delegation in Kyoto. Eizenstat reported that "every requirement the
Defense Department and uniformed military who were at Kyoto by my side said
they wanted, they got. This is self-defense, peacekeeping, humanitarian
relief."
 

Although the U.S. had already received these assurances in the negotiations,
the U.S. Congress passed an explicit provision guaranteeing U.S. military
exemption. Inter Press Service reported on May 21, 1998: "U.S. law makers,
in the latest blow to international efforts to halt global warming, today
exempted U.S. military operations from the Kyoto agreement which lays out
binding commitments to reduce 'greenhouse gas' emissions. The House of
Representatives passed an amendment to next year's military authorization
bill that 'prohibits the restriction of armed forces under the Kyoto
Protocol.'"
 

Today in Copenhagen the same agreements and guidelines on greenhouse gases
still hold. Yet it is extremely difficult to find even a mention of this
glaring omission.
 

According to environmental journalist Johanna Peace, military activities
will continue to be exempt from an executive order signed by President Barack
Obama that calls for federal agencies to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions
by 2020. Peace states, "The military accounts for a full 80 percent of the
federal government's energy demand." http://solveclimate.com/ Sept.
1)
 

The blanket exclusion of the Pentagon's global operations makes U.S.
carbon dioxide emissions appear far less than they in fact are. Yet even
without counting the Pentagon, the U.S. still has the world's largest
carbon dioxide emissions.
 

More than emissions
 

Besides emitting carbon dioxide, U.S. military operations release other
highly toxic and radioactive materials into the air, water and soil.
 

U.S. weapons made with depleted uranium have spread tens of thousands of
pounds of microparticles of radioactive and highly toxic waste throughout the
Middle East, Central Asia and the Balkans.
 

The U.S. sells land mines and cluster bombs that are a major cause of
delayed explosives, maiming and disabling especially peasant farmers and rural
peoples in Africa, Asia and Latin America. For example, Israel dropped more
than 1 million U.S.-provided cluster bombs on Lebanon during its 2006
invasion.
 

The U.S. war in Vietnam left large areas so contaminated with the Agent
Orange herbicide that today, more than 35 years later, dioxin contamination is
300 to 400 times higher than "safe" levels. Severe birth defects and
high rates of cancer resulting from environmental contamination are continuing
into a third generation.
 

The 1991 U.S. war in Iraq, followed by 13 years of starvation sanctions, the
2003 U.S. invasion and continuing occupation, has transformed the region --
which has a 5,000-year history as a Middle East breadbasket -- into an
environmental catastrophe. Iraq's arable and fertile land has become a
desert wasteland where the slightest wind whips up a dust storm. A former food
exporter, Iraq now imports 80 percent of its food. The Iraqi Agriculture
Ministry estimates that 90 percent of the land has severe
desertification.
 

Environmental war at home
 

Moreover, the Defense Department has routinely resisted orders from the
Environmental Protection Agency to clean up contaminated U.S. bases.
(Washington Post, June 30, 2008) Pentagon military bases top the Superfund list
of the most polluted places, as contaminants seep into drinking water aquifers
and soil.
 

The Pentagon has also fought EPA efforts to set new pollution standards on
two toxic chemicals widely found on military sites: perchlorate, found in
propellant for rockets and missiles; and trichloroethylene, a degreaser for
metal parts.
 

Trichloroethylene is the most widespread water contaminant in the country,
seeping into aquifers across California, New York, Texas, Florida and
elsewhere. More than 1,000 military sites in the U.S. are contaminated with the
chemical. The poorest communities, especially communities of color, are the
most severely impacted by this poisoning.
 

U.S. testing of nuclear weapons in the U.S. Southwest and on South Pacific
islands has contaminated millions of areas of land and water with radiation.
Mountains of radioactive and toxic uranium tailings have been left on
Indigenous land in the Southwest. More than 1,000 uranium mines have been
abandoned on Navajo reservations in Arizona and New Mexico.
 

Around the world, on past and still operating bases in Puerto Rico, the
Philippines, South Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Japan, Nicaragua, Panama and
the former Yugoslavia, rusting barrels of chemicals and solvents and millions
of rounds of ammunition are criminally abandoned by the Pentagon.
 

The best way to dramatically clean up the environment is to shut down the
Pentagon. What is needed to combat climate change is a thoroughgoing system
change.
 

IAC wins award for the Project Censored twenty-five "Most Censored" News Stories of 2009-10: http://www.projectcensored.org...

Slashdot Top Deals

If you can count your money, you don't have a billion dollars. -- J. Paul Getty

Working...