Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:reading back numbers is dumb (Score 1) 22

What if the sign takes up a few pixels in a box, does that count?

That is one of my problems with such recaptchas. The other problem, does a stop sign, yield sign, railroad crossing sign, etc, count as a street sign, or do they only mean signs with street names on them? I assume the former, and answer accordingly, but it always gives me a new set of images, with no indication on whether I passed or failed the previous test, so I have no fucking clue.

Comment Re:jewelry website? (Score 1) 637

Seconded. I decided to checkout because I was curious about that option, and was surprised to be redirected to, which as you mentioned, appears to be some sort of jewelry website. It also surprises me that you seem to be the only other person wondering about it.

Comment Re:Problem ... Faith (Score 1) 386

I find it ironic, that some have faith in cryogenics given the evidence for any possible success is certainly no better and in many ways much less then the evidence for a omnipotent creator who will resurrect your body at a future date.

I forget who said it, but there is an argument for believing in God which says "if you don't believe, and He does exist, you lose everything. If you do believe, but He does not exist, then you've lost nothing. So you might as well believe."

The problem with that, is which God should you choose to believe in? Zeus? Odin? Amun-Ra? Someone else?

The reason I bring this up, is that cryogenics is a bit like that. If you choose to be frozen, and in the future they are able to revive you, you get a second lease on life. If it turns out that they cannot revive you, it's no different than if you hadn't gotten frozen. So if you can afford it, you might as well freeze yourself. The difference here, is there is no "but which God should I believe in?" problem. At least not as far as I can tell.

Comment Re:The ultimate in postmortem narcissism (Score 1) 386

We have a bright future in our imaginations instead of an afterlife.

And now you have me wondering about something.

How does one balance the belief in an afterlife with the belief that, one day, a frozen body will possibly be revivable? If someone believes in an afterlife, then they believe in the existence of the soul. So what happens to your soul while you are frozen, and is this true for with all frozen bodies, or just ones that were frozen in a lab?

I'm not here to debate the existence of souls and afterlives (I believe in neither). I am simply curious how the people who do believe in such things view cryogenics.

Comment Re:ROFL (Score 1) 114

Old as I am, I still haven't figured out why death is such a big deal to so many people. It's not something anyone will suffer.

Isn't that a bit like saying "I don't know why jumping out of an airplane without a parachute is such a big deal. It's not something anyone will suffer", just flipped a bit? Yes, the instant of death / falling may not hurt, but it's the dying / sudden stop at the end that I think most people are worried about how much suffering they will endure from that.

Comment Re:Fingerprint might not work (Score 1) 233

Hell, don't even tell them that 9 of your 10 fingers will delete data. And don't offer a finger. Let them grab your hand, single out a finger, and swipe it over the reader on your phone.

Personally, I'd configure it such that none of my fingers unlocks the phone, they should all delete data. But only after.. I don't know, lets say 3... successful reads of my fingerprint. That way I don't accidentally erase my data myself.

Comment Re:Not surprising (Score 2) 56

There were probably some Domino's locations that did nothing but give out free pizza's all day. How anyone thought that was sustainable I don't know...

Free to the T-Mobile subscriber does not necessarily mean Domino's does not get paid for the pizza. It isn't clear whether or not T-Mobile was paying Domino's for each and every pizza.

Comment Re:Duh. Because God made it (Score 1) 720

The problem is that the people foisting this irrational argument (Pascal's wager) is that they never fully consider the reward/punish matrix and make another box for reward for being an atheists.

I thought the problem was the people foisting this irrational argument assume that you won't pick Zeus, or Odin, or Ra, or any of the many many many other gods that are not the particular god they think you should pick.

Comment Re: Militant Slashdot (Score 1) 295

Saying a debate should never have happened is censorship, of the worst kind.

It can be, but in this case, no it isn't.

the truth is that you just find it frustrating to deal with those you perceive to be so grossly in error. You would rather shut them up, or shut them out.

If Karmashock wanted to shut them up, why would they say "Don't like it... vote to change it through the regular process and repeal the second amendment."? It seems clear to me that Karmashock isn't trying to shut anyone up. What they want, is to have a discussion where actual legal change can occur. Trying to ban guns without changing the constitution is unconstitutional.

And no, I abhor guns. But backdoors are wrong, whether they are for encryption, or law.

Slashdot Top Deals

The following statement is not true. The previous statement is true.