Why does mainstream science rely on defensive emotional attacks when its assumptions are questioned?

Google is one of the companies that built the tools that allow propaganda to be made much more efficiently, funny its own employees fell for it hook line and sinker.

In the age when males are beating females in sports by pretending to be females the structural inability to tell the truth, to provide negative feedback is not only hurting female sports. Musk will never land a star ship on the Moon or Mars or anything because he is a sharlatan and he hires former government officials who signed government checks, he is burning through billions of tax money with every flight, all of these star ship flights are pointless. Gaza residents and Hamas operatives not only indistinguishable, they share the same values. People protesting pro terrorism (against Israel) are wrong for the same reasons this male athlete is participating in female sports. USA denying help to Ukraine is literally murdering thousands of Ukrainians and promoting putinism, which is terrorism. USA federal reserve has created the inflation by monetizing government debt and so the economy is dying. The planet is going to become extremely hostile to people because we are still burning coal, oil and gas for power and heat production instead of building more nuclear power plants. There are more and more lies all over.

These Googlers are a sad reflection of the modern approach to reality - our game is ignorance, lies and denial and these protests are just a form of it.

Terrorists are very good at pushing their messages, this is clear today. ruZia, hamas, Iran, north korea even, apparently they are very effective at this entire psyops thing. Israel needs to eliminate the threat, AFAIC this can entirely mean whiping out the entire Gaza population also I hope they take out Iran's rocket and drone manufacturing capabilities, this would help both, Israel and Ukraine.

That was 12 years ago. A 12 year out of date critique of a web technology that has had ongoing language updates and two entire rewrites in that interval should be viewed with some suspicion. Also, are you really just citing the title of the article and none of the content?

I'm not even defending PHP here, just questioning lazy kneejerk, "but it sucked once, so now I hate it forever" thinking.

Apologies if you weren't aiming the criticism towards me. I'm a bit too tired to be writing comments now. LOL

Huh? All I'm saying is the extreme left (the actual extreme left) is communist, not fascist. There's a difference.

I'm again all authoritarianism, whether it be communism, fascism, theocracies, etc. Not sure what would make this a right-wing thing.

You know, I always find it funny when within someone's hysterical rantings they deem who needs help.

Your exaggerations continue as you compare a child checking out a controversial book from a library to smoking, drinking liquor, making porn videos, or buying guns. These things are not comparable, not even to the point that it supports your argument.

And you know it.

As you also know that there's no such thing as a "lefty fascist". I mean, really dude - the actual extreme left is bad enough with Communism. No need to make shit up.

Equating librarians making controversial books available to all, to them "wanting to control how you raise your children" is one of the most disingenuous exaggerations I've ever heard. They aren't forcing children to check out the books. Adults can still supervise their children. And I guarantee your kids will hear things you don't want them to at some point in their lives apart from what they see in libraries. It's just part of growing up.

You're picking a strange hill to die on.

So what that he encouraged or developed something, he is not the person who had actual access to this information, he never worked for any agency in USA where he would have to promise not to disclose information, to him (or anyone who doesn't work for such agencies) status of any 'secret' information is completely irrelevant, as it should be.

For example, if I egged on some general to disclose top secret information about some project and then he did disclose it, it would be on the general, not on me or anyone who encouraged him. HE IS THE ONE WHO PROMISED NOT TO DISCLOSE IT NO MATTER WHAT, not me, not anyone else.

I am not a 'right wing', I am not a 'left wing', I am a libertarian, anarcho capitalist, it puts me completely outside of what is considered to be normal politics in the USA by the way and I say that Assange has done nothing wrong at all and he is being terrorized because he embarrassed people who have power.

*this* is what "proves" it? Not the kidnappings, the torture, the murders? )

Yeah, you don't understand what will actually happen. What will actually happen is just more terrorism by the government that is already terrorist in nature. Kadyrov is a murderer, torturer, terrorist, his fame to claim was that he murdered his first russian at the age of 16. Today he routinely murders anyone who opposes his rule in any way, real or imaginary. His son kidnaps and beats a kid who posts something online that Kadyrov finds offensive. People routinely disappear, never to be seen again. People get tortured for anything that Kadyrov doesn't like.

At the same time Chechnia's economy only exists because putin provides Chechnia with billions of dollars every year from the russian budget.

You don't understand what is actually happening there. They don't care about law or whatever, if they hear something they don't like, you'll disappear and be raped and tortured and killed and that's about it. This entire thing about the music is really nothing at all, it just means that if someone *hears* music that is not Chechen they will report you and you will be gone.

The agony, of course, is that Dieter Rams was all about function, which informed his designs. If Apple had hired him (he's still alive, incredibly) instead of just imitating him, he'd probably have taken a significantly different direction that actually respected the complexity of the underlying hardware instead of trying to butcher it. And the logos would have been smaller!

What if the guy who designed the cowling fasteners at Boeing never actually had to use a wrench to take the thing off and on and made it so it is a stupid pain for mechanics? What if a fastener rusted due to failure of another more critical and warrantied part? Do you own Boeing stock?

Do you get paid to astro-turf for United or do you do it out of love of neoliberalism?

But why shouldn't we throw Boeing under the bus, just because we feel like it? Who cares if this corporation is treated unfairly, when I get treated unfairly too every day?