Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Who's going to pay for it? (Score 1) 154

If you didn't whine then, why are you whining now?

Gen-Xer (barely) here who made it, at the tail end of when people generally still could. I'm thankful every day for the luck I've had. Yes, it's been hard work for many years. Yes, I was incredibly lucky to benefit from the opportunities that were once plentiful but become rarer every year. The generations that came after us have gotten a raw deal. The downturns hit them differently than they hit you and me. They didn't have any kind of safety net built up and they are still recovering as the next wave hits. It's our responsibility to help them so that society as a whole can succeed. It's the greedy choice too, because helping them will help ourselves.

Comment Re:$110 to $130 a dose... That's obscene! (Score 1) 128

Seems like it should be part of our constitution that any technology developed with public funding can not be sold to private companies except via a super-majority vote, and then only to non-profits corporations. Likewise, no exclusive access licensing agreements can be made that would prevent access to those technologies by the general public.

Comment Re:Bad idea (Score 1) 100

There are some classes of software that should be regulated. Take for instance the Sony copy protection rootkit from 2005 that was auto-installed on windows computers when you inserted a music CD into your CDROM drive. You could argue that the offense was the auto-installing nature of the rootkit. I would argue however that even if the user agreed to install it via the EULA, it should *still* be illegal and a federal criminal offense to install rootkits on computers as part of some completely unrelated product. This is especially true for products where the user is intentionally being deceived and is likely to have no idea what a rootkit even does.

Debate about whether or not TikTok should be regulated is fine, but I'm absolutely in favor of certain classes of abusive software being regulated at the Federal level. It's just a question of what should be regulated and why.

Comment Re:Good! (Score 1) 143

Yep. I suspect the people making these comments weren't enterprising kids/teenagers back in the late 80s and early 90s. Most parents were far too preoccupied with MTV, the Simpsons, and eventually games like Mortal Kombat to even remotely be worried about the internet, assuming they even knew what it was at that point.

Comment Re:Good! (Score 4, Insightful) 143

I was dialing into BBSes playing LORD on my cobbled together 286 with a 1200 baud modem when I was like 10-12 years old. "Internet" access was pretty much limited to certain BBS gateway features but it was still there.

We did tell our kids when they were younger that we didn't want them getting sucked into social media. Having said that, our approach over the years has been much more about open communication and discussion rather than trying to control the content they accessed. Even though I'm far more capable than the average parent of locking things down, that plan always seemed like a losing proposition. Instead, we told them about 4chan/8chan and why they should be careful. We told them about how social media can screw with your emotions. We told them they *deserve* privacy and would have it from us so long as they didn't do anything that was unhealthy/dangerous/illegal. We talk regularly about law, politics, society, and morality. We watch Rick and Morty and play Cards against Humanity together. It hasn't been perfect, but given the stresses today's youth face I think they've done remarkably well and I'm really proud of them. I wouldn't do it differently.

Comment Re: Good on him (Score 1) 44

Oh, I realize now you might have meant more emphasis on the "almost" part. I don't know what the parent specifically meant in this context, but Chess is partially solved:

"Fully solving chess remains elusive, and it is speculated that the complexity of the game may preclude its ever being solved. Through retrograde computer analysis, endgame tablebases (strong solutions) have been found for all three- to seven-piece endgames, counting the two kings as pieces. Some variants of chess on a smaller board with reduced numbers of pieces have been solved. Some other popular variants have also been solved; for example a weak solution to Maharajah and the Sepoys is an easily memorable series of moves that guarantees victory to the "sepoys" player."

Comment Re: Research (Score 2, Insightful) 344

My experience has been that inspections basically have three functions:

1) Convince the bank to give you a loan.
2) Give you an out over some ridiculous infraction if you change your mind.
3) Make you feel good about your purchase.

I caught way more things wrong on both home inspections I had than our inspector did. Blatantly obvious things too. Want a good inspection? Go buy a flir thermal camera (or phone attachment) and a moisture meter and make the rounds yourself. You can do everything from looking at heat build up in the electrical panel and any exposed high current wiring, to looking at insulation and heat loss, to looking for signs of water intrusion. That alone is already far more than either of my inspectors did.

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...