It was all good to the end there, then you started sending me these coded ssl certs, and I think you just hacked my computer. damn you smart people and your buffer overflows.
There is no irony, but I think we can all see the disrespect.
Careful with absolutes like NOTHING...
How about increasing from 1mpg to 2mpg.
Or 1mpg to 10mpg
Can you explain that one again for me? I've read that before and it all made sense, but now it's not adding up in my thick head.
It is clear that going from 10-20 is twice as much as going 20-30....
But in my head 20-40 also seems like twice as much.
require vehicle fleets to average 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025
The key words here are FLEET and AVERAGE. None of the car companies are saying they have a problem with 25mpg on a 4cyl econocrap. What they are having a problem with is having a F150, F250 and F350 also average in to that FLEET with that 35mpg focus, and still keep the average up. Sure, not everyone needs and SUV, but many business do need an F250 to pull some heavy equipment.
And companies like nissan have proven you don't have to get 12mpg to get a car to go 0-60 in under 6 seconds.
he has high uid. doesn't know what pseudonym means...
I'm glad my iphone isn't controlled by some mega-company...
Your first sentence makes me realize that I made the mistake I usually criticize people for. Comparing a particular apple phone, to the entire gamut of android phones. You over generalize when you compare a single model to an entire brand, or multiple brands of phones all at once.
But I can say that yes, our iphones have both proven to be of better than the Galaxy S, and my boss's Motorola Droid.
All the android people come out screaming about all their advanced features and how they're always ahead of apple. But what they don't do is come out screaming about the high quality of their phones. I've got an ORIGINAL iphone. My wife has a 4. I also have a company supplied Galaxy S, and we've both had blackberries. As far as features, the android phones always win. As for quality, dependability, stability, etc the iphones always win. Blackberry used to have that wrapped up, but they've fallen behind on quality in the last 5 years.
Oh, let me do a good old fashioned fixed that for you:
The masses are hooked on quality in functionality,
Yeah, that was hilarious.
Yes, I'm also an iPhone user.
Yes, I'm going to buy a 5, not matter what. I'm currently on an ORIGINAL iphone. I need a new phone. I also have a Galaxy S, and it's shit. No, not 'Tha Shiit' but, like a piece of shit. Don't like it. Don't like the seemingly empty android market place. Don't like the the fact that if I use half the features on it my battery is dead in 12 hours.
So yes. I haven't seen a iP5 but I sure as hell am going to be getting one.
You young whipper snappers. Why I was first on
Eh, they're not far from being able to do it, and meet your requirements. Take an iMac, strip it of everything that makes it expensive, the harddrive, most of the memory, many of the ports etc. Call it a vMac. Have it only connect to a Lion server via VDI. And in reverse, only a Mac can connect to lion. Charge $300-$500 for it. Let Lion run as a guest on a hyper-v host.
Do it again for the mini so people can supply their own monitors. Sell that for $200. Boom, everyone happy. IT guys get to virtualize and do terminals. Professionals get their macs. Apple sells more hardware.
No, you're wrong. It IS old, but they descoverred it.
See my rule # 4, it was specifically designed for Mercury and Venus, who are both Larger than pluto, yet have no natural orbiting rock.
Only through hard work and perseverance can one truly suffer.