Comment Re:$200 per device for the Windows license (Score 1) 214
What legal fees revolve around having a proper licence and not an OEM(The normal version was $120, OEM was $100)
What legal fees revolve around having a proper licence and not an OEM(The normal version was $120, OEM was $100)
Yes I meant OEM. I looked and a normal copy is only like $120 on newegg if you want to get anal over licencing terms.
Windows 7 home OME is like $100 on newegg.
I didn't say that you have to. If your willing to pay money, there are plenty of places you can go. I was referring to people who don't want to pay for it or have money(Although co.cc on a business card is just as bad)
because someone has to actually host the mailserver. Not everyone knows how to do that themselves.
You have the option of paying a company to do it or use a free service like hotmail/gmail/yahoo(not sure if yahoo or hotmail let you use your own domain, I don't touch them)
Thanks! Got an invite
would not mind an invite myself, matthew.r.cash(gmail)
I'll admit I had a box pwned.
Setup a VPS with a bunch of software and forgot about it for a few months so it never got updated. Logged on and one of the daemon users had a bunch of stuff running on it(Chinese spam going to Chinese boxes, so no real damage occurred) It wasn't rooted or anything but i wiped the machine anyways.
I think you are more likely to have a swat team shot first and ask questions later.
Flagless Ship in the middle of the ocean. Solves that issue.
I haven't and won't upgrade until VLC can play blueray natively which isn't going to happen due to all the DRM shit.
The US is actively dismantling nuclear weapons. US has moved from huge stockpiles of tends of thousands to thousands now. They also have moved from multiple warheads on a launch vehicle to a single warhead. Just because the US still has nukes doesn't mean they aren't working toward disarmament. The only issue not stopping the US from dismantling all at once is the fact that other countries like Russia still has a shitton of nukes. Might I also note both sides still have teams on full alert, like back in the cold war days, ready to press a button and fire a couple thousands nukes within 1 minute and their entire arsenal in 15 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Fukushima_nuclear_accidents
I find that fairly useful, as it shows a new chart for particular times so you can see how different things have progressed.
As someone who has dealt with both, I can say the reason postgresql isn't as popular is because its more involved in its setup. Mysql is simpler for new people. You install it, download phpmyadmin, login as root and then start creating databases and stuff. postgresql isn't as simple. Creating a new database is a bit more involved and when i first was confronted with it, I wondered why it was so complex.
I don't even know how to take advantage of more complex stuff in postgresql either.
This is coming from someone who is mildly experinced with mysql and set up a postgresql server not knowing anything.
Its like taking a Ubuntu person and sticking them on slackware/gentoo or something. Although its similar its still radically different.
General nuclear plant doesn't operate under the correct conditions for a nuclear explosion. Even if they were using highly enriched uranium(which they most likely are not), the conditions in a reactor are not suitable for an explosion.
At most they will get a large moltant pool of radioactive lava that turns the area into a wasteland, like chernobyl. Depending on which side of japan the plants are on(to lazy to look) either very little of the population will be effected, or a very, very large % of the island will be uninhabitable due to fallout(generated by other stuff in the facility exploding)
Where there's a will, there's a relative.