Like it or not, today's kids already know far, far more about technology than their teachers (college-level engineering professors excepted, and sometimes even then). In particular, the research and collaborative aspects of technology that most apply to education, kids "get" in a way only the uber-geeks among their elders will ever grasp.
I would agree to that.. but not for EVERY child in the classroom.
Assuming that the computers being used in schools are not allowed to be customized by students (not being root, or not having admin priv in windows), what really is the difference between open source and using windows? Opening a program is honestly the same between the two (assuming icons are on the desktop). Students/teachers not knowing how to use the computers is not an issue as long as they can get to the encyclopedia, or whatever learning software they need on the PC.
Now, if we both accept public school as merely a form of socialized babysitting with the occasional unintended side effect of imparting a bit of knowledge from the tedious daily busy-work, I'll agree that having the prisoners more competent than the jailers raises serious control issues... But from the "education" perspective, the brand of tool doesn't matter, only that it works. And mind your metaphors!
Agreed, its sad that alot of teachers do just use busy-work as a way to get through their day, instead of giving work to help the students learn. I know thats the way it is at least in inner city schools (aka Washington DC... its fun down here...), but certainly not in the ones I grew up in in suburban NY, there, the teachers at least care and are not just trying to 'survive another day.'
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker