Having biometrics is equivalent to having a physical key.
Fingerprints specifically are a password you can never change that you leave copies of everywhere you go. It's the worst possible "security" imaginable. It's just convenient.
I know y'all like using 1984 as a manual, but you don't have to follow it so exactly.
(Although, limiting it to only two minutes would be nice.)
You can't go after people who claim to live in one of their extra homes for tax purposes but in reality are cheating the people of your state! That's so unfair, they might have to sell one of their vacation homes or even their yacht!
"The rich" = "people who have more than I do".
Most people posting here would be considered "the rich" by Joe Democrat.
Envy is the fuel that engine runs on.
b) make the society feel safe enough that it does not feel the need for guns.
Importing as many criminals as possible, and giving criminals a little slap on the wrist, especially if they are "disadvantaged" and have "root causes", is precisely not the way to do that.
>“This new offence sends a crystal clear message that making this material is immoral, often misogynistic, and a crime.”
Have we given up on the word "misogynistic" having any meaning whatsoever anymore? If you took the subset of deepfake porn that targets men we wouldn't say it's often misandrist. That word has become used as "something potentially negatively affecting a woman," which isn't what it actually means.
Not to mention that nobody can even define a woman anymore. That might complicate things
Without taxes, how's the government going to pay all those people to round up the illegal aliens you're so scared of?
See, stuff like this is how you lose. Refusing to acknowledge real problems, and engaging in childishness.
So please, keep it up.
Solution, stop voting republican, they're the ones repeatedly blocking the IRS from providing this ervice.
It's certainly "solved" low inflation, full employment, and all that rot. Good show!
(On this topic though, sure, should be a gov version of filing software.)
That was 12 years ago. A 12 year out of date critique of a web technology that has had ongoing language updates and two entire rewrites in that interval should be viewed with some suspicion. Also, are you really just citing the title of the article and none of the content?
I'm not even defending PHP here, just questioning lazy kneejerk, "but it sucked once, so now I hate it forever" thinking.
Watching a movie on the big screen with a bunch of civilized strangers was kinda cool.
Watching a movie anywhere with a significant percentage of obnoxious jerks sucks.
If all else fails, lower your standards.
