The only voice assistent that'll ever enter my house is MyCroft. Whether it's Google, Apple or Amazon, they have too many interests that contradict those of the consumer. In contrast, that creates the USP for MyCroft to focus on privacy and create an open source device to gather to the niche who still values that. Just hope they make some progress with their Mark II...

First random search action gives me: https://github.com/joshenders/... So if you do a bit of a better search I'm sure you could find something to use.

I know companies using IRC internally that simply wrote a custom module for their IRC server to log all messages on channels that had to be audited (or just all messages, not sure). With IRC there's nothing that prohibits the messages from getting stored centrally. I'm not sure how that applies to XMPP due to its federated architecture.

Good thing IRC will be still around by the time Slack goes bust^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H is acquired by Yahoo.

No more SPoF's! Except when there's plenty of people who have no idea how git actually works, and use it much in the same fashion as they would with Subversion. Well, good reason for them to start reading up on how Git actually works so they don't have to be reliant on Github whenever a ban would be imposed.

All the while we're calling out to China for their censorship practices. It seems the western parts of this world are not all that much better, doesn't it?

It will be for a long term. You're welcome.

I don't really care for the software on my desktop, as long as it works. Having said that, the only paid and closed source piece of software on my desktop is my IDE (being a developer and sysadmin). However, on servers, serving public facing services I'll probably always use open source software. If I need a bug fixed or a new feature implemented I don't want to rely on external parties. Sure, there's tons of contracts that you could sign, but experience learns that eventually the vendor isn't able to supply, and you'll need to fix things yourself.

They won't. In the EU (not sure about other regions/countries), a judge (if a fine is contested) is to hold a pretty high bar when it comes to fines or penalties. There must be no doubt that the party is in breach before the fine can be validated.

If this law is to be in place for the next 20+ years it'd be pretty moronic if it laid out a very detailed set of technical measures a party is expected to take. Luckily there's lawyers who can interpet the law, and apply it to the situation they're assessing, all of its context included. If other lawyers (i.e. prosecution) disagree with their views, we have judges who can elaborate on the law, and tell how it should be interpreted in situations like those.

You're leaving out some of the considerations that are at play here. That is that you have a right to learn from your mistakes, move on. Also, they're not prohibiting publishing those facts, the intention is merely to make it less easily findable. The USA has a similar mechanism, namely sealed court records, etc.

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C...

TL;DR