Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I would be very concerned (Score 1) 532

About a year ago I left my phone on while flying on two planes since I had a layover. First off, I can confirm it does connect, even on 3G since, while I was landing in Toronto, I pulled up google maps on the iPhone which then downloaded the local map to where the phone had never been and then showed me where the plane was flying above on the ground through the GPS. I was able to find spots I recognized only cause the GPS let me know where I actually was as I watched it track our landing.

The more important item of interest though is this, a cell phone antennae is omni directional (every direction). Turning your cell phone off inside a plane does not prevent cell phone signals from being in the plane since the cell phone towers which are communicating with as little as one phone that is not inside the plane, those towers are broadcasting in every direction. Cell phone towers don't know which way a cell phone is (remember it takes 3 towers to find a position through triangulation because one tower doesn't know). Because the tower doesn't know then, if someone is standing on the opposite side of a cell tower from an airplane, the airplane is still receiving the cell towers data and depending on the position of the phone then it is receiving the data from the phone to. The only rason a plane would not receive data from a cell phone outside of the plane is the plane is further away then the signal strength can reach and if a phones signal strength reaches a cell phone tower then it's pretty powerful already. A plane has plenty of windows and is therefor not a Faraday cage or even close. If cell phones were a hazard to planes then there would be no cell phone towers anywhere close to an airport at all.

I heard this once, but this may just be an urban legend, but I heard that cell phones aren't allowed during takeoff and landing because for some reason or another they don't want people in the plane communicating with people outside the plane. I don't know if this is true or not so take it with a grain of salt but the notion had to do with, if there is an emergency in the plane, we don't want you calling someone outside the plane and letting them know (which will likely lead to the news finding out if it's a panic situation) and vice versa. If there is an emergency on the ground, they don't want people inside the plain to find out causing terror which would spread to everyone on the plane in short order and create another bad situation so yeah. Again, this may be an old wives tale. Take it with a grain of salt but, if thats true then it does make sense. See the movie Die Hard 2 ;)

Comment As far as visitors go (Score 1) 421

My company now hosts are servers in a massive data center (it was in the /. story of the top 10 largest data centers a few months ago) and, when we were touring the data center prior to moving in, they had a room that sounds exactly like what you are describing you want to make. The aspect regarding visitors is this, their is an observation platform, outside of the room, behind it, where there is a large window that you can see in. This is one of the electronic windows where, when you flick a wall switch, the window changes between clear / normal and between a completely hazed white semi transparent window. When it's turned to off, all you can see is light from the room. You cannot even tell exactly where the screens are. This can work wonders since, mostly you want this room to be kept private so it helps prevent people from just peering in but, additionally, since it's behind the room and since it makes no sound to activate, I don't think the staff will immediately notice that someone is there looking in. This makes for a great demonstration tool and at the same time allows you to look in on the staff in person without letting them know but at the same time, without hiding it from them.

Comment A little too late to ask. (Score 1) 312

can we really trust these guys to predict the financial markets any better than they did World Cup?

You're asking if we can trust big banks to predict the financial markets when we are on the slow rebound from a crashed economy? I think you're a couple years too late asking this question and the answer is a clear "no"! No we can not.

Comment Tens of thousands of musicians? (Score 3, Interesting) 161

While the spokesperson for creative commons may or may not be right, I would like to know that tens of thousands is an accurate number and where he got it from. I hope he is right but I am skeptical that this is a real figure. I know all the artists he mentioned have used creative commons ("including acts like Nine Inch Nails, the Beastie Boys, David Byrne, Radiohead, and Snoop Dogg"). In fact Nine Inch Nails is my favorite band and I was excited when Trent Reznor made that decision for Nine Inch Nails and it's being followed through with his new band How To Destroy Angels (lead by his wife Mariqueen Maandig). I felt these were strong acts in supporting Creative Commons which has served me and many others very well in our business and personal lives. None the less, can someone please point me to a site, registry, document or anything that says tens of thousands of musicians in a reputable manner as the spokesperson has claimed?

Submission + - Internet goes down in Miami

An anonymous reader writes: Today in Miami there was a internet outage that seemed to affect at least 2 different ISP and one of the largest data centers in the world. At 7:41 PM EST I got a SMS from a coworker that the office internet was down (Hotwire ISP). At the same time my home ISP was down but 5 minutes earlier it was working. Within a minute I started receiving alerts on my phone that our servers were down which were hosted at the NAP of the Americas. This lasted for about 10 minutes before service on all three ISP/locations were restored. I'm curious what other ISP were affected (was Comcast and AT&T) so please comment on that if they were.

Comment Re:Back to the original subject... (Score 1) 1213

I think it's excellent that you know how to use the back button on your mouse and I'm gonna let you finish but I hope that one day you learn that back and up are not the same thing and while you can use the breadcrumb bar, thats hardly an excuse for not having a up button but then again it's Microsoft. I mean, just because a feature takes 4 lines of code and a image and is considered normal everywhere else in the world doesn't mean I expect them to take the 10 minutes to develop and implement it.

Comment Re:Wow. (Score 2, Interesting) 264

This is a joke. Right? I mean how is this evidence for anything other then the fact that I paid for a phone that did not have proper security programmed into it in the first place? It took open source programmers who worked for free (I assume) to point out how the paid for product had dropped the ball and didn't have real security in the first place. Furthermore, Linux is free because the author didn't want to charge for it. Are you saying the OS is invalid because he didn't put a price tag on it? By the way, if you are not joking then you should know MS, Oracle and IBM (those are just the ones I am aware of in your list) provide open source freeware (MS working on both Silverlight/Moonlight through Novell and Active Directory with/through samba). Also if you are not joking, please tell me you are confined to a institution that makes sure a spork is the most dangerous thing you have access to. You sound like the last person that should own a gun.

If you think free software should be outlawed, all you are doing is mandating a law that says people have to charge for something even if they don't want to.

P.S. FOSS people are not known to steal anything, instead we create it from scratch and the iPhone code that Ubuntu 10.04 uses was built from scratch it was not taken from any code apple provided as apple has never provided that code to anyone AFAIK. MS has only ever made idle threats about patents without naming any identifiable aspect of it. What have we stolen from anyone. If I don't want to use Windows or OS X then you think you have the write to say I can't program productive software for it or do you honestly believe that we have somehow hacked into apple and stolen the source code for the iPhone.

P.P.S.: The post is true. I have been able to access my PIN protected iPhone 3G (not 3GS) from Ubuntu 10.04 since I installed it. The security aspect is a bit of a concern but then again, since I knew cops have been able to do this all along then I am not that surprised. The plus side is I can now upload songs to my iPhone from Linux without doing a Jail Break (I'm reluctant to Jail Break) and without having to run an app in Wine (since I hate Windows emulation) so kudos to Ubuntu for exposing a security vulnerability and at the same time making the iPhone more usable on Linux. Job well done.

Comment Trendnet and Linksys (Score 1) 374

Trendnet seems to be GPL compliant in releasing source code to the surveillance cameras we installed however there is no build environment or firmware tools. Linksys on the other hand, while I don't know if they have involvement with GPL on the device in question, I know we have some managed switches from them that are IE only (or at least not compatible with ff, opera or chrome/chromium) and required me to install ies4linux in order to configure them. I didn't test with w3m.

Comment But what about the porn? (Score 1) 263

They use the phrase "all manner of malicious web content" to describe porn among other things. Since when is porn considered malicious web content. It's a legal job for willing volunteers and it's also a local job that isn't heavily out sourced to foreign countries (though foreign countries make their own porn too). I think the author should have thought about that statement and perhaps gave the preview button some thought before they posted.

Comment Re:Or you would get a raise. (Score 2, Interesting) 79

Well I didn't say I would buy it from them but then again I might. Fact is I won't buy it though till I know the big dogs are supporting it and economically speaking, by the time it's adopted by trusted firms, well it's reasonable to assume that the cost of the technology itself may have dropped to the point where the firms who charge more for it will probably be cheaper then what it costs now when it's a new product since prices are almost always higher when a new technology has been released and hasn't been widely adopted yet.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...