nvidia is evil since they don't publish their hardware programming manual like AMD(ATI)/Intel. Buy AMD(ATI) or Intel. Avoid like hell nvidia till they release their manuals.

... for instance, those who code systems, or supervise the developement, of all the naugthy and dangerous systems for internet control...

Hu... more than busybox... we want optimal Linux driver code

This not about what people are interested in, it's the fact that *any* hardware device distributed to people should be hackable without having to crack it. It is a matter of digital freedom. The feature should be there by default.

Finally, it's coming through! In the context of replacing totally the services provided by classic telephony, we must set up neutral IP traffic classes (VoIP over mobile radio link do *NOT* work reliably, and won't be after broad adoption of the FTTH). Indeed, the idea is to give priority to voice traffic on client initiative. The *only* allowed exception to this rule would be emergency calls, because that has to be done at the ISP initiative. We can even think of a video stream for emergency calls! With enough good video quality... imagine the amount of people we could additionnally save thanks to the video!!! We already have the terminals able to do so! We need to set up that next gen Internet ASAP!

We should be able to hack the hardware we bought. Locking away users like that is way overboard. I would like to enjoy mario, zelda AND SPACE INVADERS EXTREME 2 on the same device I hack GNU/Linux on without having to crack it.

well... that's unfortunately the way to go...

... some need a very specific context to be able to express their brilliance... it is not enough to just let them "outside". They should check if the context those people are in is proper to maximize their brilliance output. For instance, rights on the code they write is *very* important for ope source software. The Linux community is very strong because coders keep and don't share ligthtly their rigths on the code. It has drawbacks (unable to go to (A)GPLv3 limited by userspace), but it is a very strong protection. If a company could distribute a closed and proprietary version of Linux, they would do it for sure (cf opensolaris/solaris case and darwin/macos case).

Some communities have their own DNS. Indeed, emails can nicely be done only with DNS MX records. Hope google will stick to the current DNS protocol. If they want to extend the protocol... it has to be extremely simple to implement and go throught classic normalization processes.

... oh wait... hackers do install GNU/Linux on their DS!

Is the GNU/Linux support ready?

Will we be able to code C native apps on their OSes?

From an open source point of view... this is a mistake since we (as open source people) must favor AMD GPUs. Moreover, it has been 2 years the AMD GPUs seem faster than nvidia ones. So from such bad news, open source people must keep the bearing: favor AMD GPUs whatever.

Indeed they are rigth on one point: gimp has a complex GUI for basic photo editing. The proper way is to go like blender, split the engine and the GUI. But I thougth GEGL was that engine, then it's a matter to have basic photo edition done with this engine. As far as I'm concern, people around me prefer gthumb by far, it is more usuable, more stable, damn faster, damn leaner etc... Maybe 10.04 is also the time to default to gthumb.