Pretty much any router supported by DD-WRT (and some other 3rd party firmwares) can do this. There are also some recent models with "guest networks" such as all of Cisco Linksys's E series models.
I never said IE9 is slow or not competitive for javascript, I said that FF4 has the second fastest Javascript engine next to Chrome's and that IE9's Sunspider results are slightly flawed due to it eliminating dead code. IE9's dead code elimination is fine in the Sunspider test but it shows that the test itself is flawed and IE9's dead code elimination had many flaws that suggested they were only doing it to improve their Sunspider score. The V8 and Kraken benchmarks do a better job at testing modern javascript performance.
It explains multiple flaws and I admit I do not know if they were fixed or not. Although dead code elimination is valid, it only works on poorly written code typically found in badly designed benchmarks. The math-cordac test in Sunspider isn't trying to test how well browsers can eliminate the code, it's trying to find out how fast they can do the math. So while it's fine for IE9 to be eliminating the dead code in math-cordac, the test itself needs to be updated so that all browsers actually do the math that it's trying to test.
I posted this already just below this but here it is again: http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2010/11/17/dead-code-elimination-for-beginners/
I admit that I do not know whether IE9 fixed all the flaws in their dead code elimination but it used to be incredibly flawed and dead code elimination only works for poorly written code that you would typically only find in badly written benchmarks anyways. However, the real problem is the test itself and so Sunspider should be updated so that IE9 actually does the math that Sunspider is trying to test the performance of.
I said to ignore Peacekeeper because my original post was about JAVASCRIPT and HARDWARE ACCELERATION but Peacekeeper tries to test overall browser performance. I can't find any links for you but the major problem with Peacekeeper's Javascript benchmarks is that they call getTime() from within loops instead of outside of the loop which makes the tests mostly about how fast they can call getTime() instead of running the actual code that they're trying to test.
Since you can't be bothered to google:
http://blog.mozilla.com/rob-sayre/2010/11/17/dead-code-elimination-for-beginners/
For Javascript performance you can see the SS/V8/Kraken results from this comparison but note that IE9 cheats on Sunspider with faulty dead code removal that is removing code that needs to be executed and ignore Peacekeeper because it's flawed in many ways and also tests more than Javascript...
For info about why FF4 RC is slower than IE9 in some hardware acceleration tests which they will be fixing soon (probably after FF4 release) see this:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2011/03/investigating_p.html
You must not have even tried Firefox 4 RC. Firefox will soon be on par with IE9's hardware acceleration for vista/win7 while also supporting HW acceleration on other platforms including XP which Microsoft won't do, and Firefox 4 has the second fastest javascript engine next to Chrome's.
What they're saying is that the benchmark is badly designed and is testing the javascript minimum timeout more than anything else. Properly designed hardware acceleration tests try to render more and more stuff until the framerate goes below 60 instead of rendering hardly anything and seeing how high the framerate goes.
Yep, FyRE666's "benchmark" is another bad benchmark that depends on the javascript timeout value. I get 95fps on the current nightly with mintimeout=10 (current default that will be changed soon) but 190fps if I set dom.min_timeout_value=4 (IE9's timeout value and what the HTML5 draft spec now requires).
There's actually been multiple blog posts by Microsoft and one by Opera too about how other browsers don't have "full hardware acceleration" but Mozilla has been open, honest, and accurate when they describe what acceleration API's FF4 uses on each platform.
Technology that can be used to fly should not count for LAND-speed records. Strapping freaking jet engines and rockets onto a car and keeping it from lifting off just makes it a jet-rocket that never lifts off.
You know there's a list of which versions have which features. There are some 4MB versions that have IPv6 support.
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/What_is_DD-WRT%3F#File_Versions
We're talking about Microsoft's plugins that enable h.264 in HTML5 video tags for other browsers. It has nothing to do with Flash.
It also causes Firefox to ask if you want to save tabs every time you close a window (like popups) which is incredibly annoying.
You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred. -- Superchicken
