Comment Re:Samsung can't release it's OWN designs?!? (Score 1) 354
Because the victim did not agree to it.
Oh, but she HAS agreed to it: by retaining her USA citizenship.
The victim is of course free to renounce her citizenship, at which point she is bound by USA laws only so long as she remains on USA soil. If she chooses to relocate, she is well-advised to pick a country where the prevailing definition of "morality" (a) is not the law of the land, and/or (b) allows women to have any rights whatsoever.
The above illustrates is why "morality" is a bullshit metric. In a Taliban-run society, it would be the victim's "right" to be raped, and then executed in a honor-killing. Because in their interpretation, that's moral behavior.
You don't like the law at issue in this thread. Fine. But your sense of morality is irrelevant here. I also think that you misunderstand both the law itself, as well as the context in which it was created and is applied, possibly because you have no firsthand experience in either. And your understanding of the "right to free speech" needs some work, too.