Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Well actually.. (Score 1) 174

We had a rash of fevers and dry coughs throughout February, with a child of one person having an atypical pneumonia which proved very hard to treat.

There were many bad colds and lingering coughs this past winter. I knew someone with multi-week symptoms at any given point from September all the way through February. Everyone I know who was convinced they had Covid and got the antibody test turned up negative. There are a lot of other sources for these things.

Comment Re: Also applies to vote by mail (Score 1) 338

You've asked questions, but most of them seem to be of the "I don't know what's going on here" variety rather than evidence of anything actually going wrong. Do you know how voter registration databases are maintained? Do you have evidence they're out of date? By how much? And what does happen to ballots sent to addresses where people no longer live? Why do you think they're fraudulently used, instead of just thrown away? If YOU got a ballot for a former resident, would you try to vote for them? Why or why not? Can you forge their signature? Would you know they're not voting somewhere else? There's a clear paper trail to your address, so if two ballots from the same person end up in the system, where do you think they're going to look first?

Comment Re: Also applies to vote by mail (Score 2) 338

1) You can drop your ballot off at a safe drop spot. Or any mailbox, anywhere. You don't have to put it in your own personal mailbox for outgoing.
2) If one district had a suspiciously low ballot return percentage - say 40% instead of 60% everywhere else, I think they'd investigate.
3) Many states have methods where you can look up online and confirm your mail-in ballot was received.
4) Any mail carriers handling ballots would have to have a pretty good reason to believe the ballots in their hands skew opposite their own voting preferences. For all they know, they could be hurting their own cause.
5) They'd be taking all these chances in exchange for felony charges, and as mail carriers also losing their job forever if caught tampering with mail.

Comment Re:Also applies to vote by mail (Score 1) 338

And if you get them on tape messing with your vote, they're going to prison on felony charges. If this was rampant, even if 90% of them were getting away with it, we'd have at least some cases. So either being a felony is already enough of a deterrent, or people don't find it worth it to coerce one vote at a time.

Several states have had vote by mail for decades. Have you seen a single headline about a boss buying his employees' votes?

Comment Re:Something off with the math (Score 1) 334

Antibody tests in my area are coming in under 4%. That doesn't gel at all with an assumption that 20% of the country has been exposed already. I think New York is an outlier.

Admittedly, I'm rural. Exposure in dense urban areas is probably higher, and that also has a greater proportion of the population. On the flip side, those antibody tests were open to the public, and presumably went to people who had at least some reason to think they've already had the disease, so the results are probably higher than the general population.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...