Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:A new name for this? (Score 1) 586

I think that's a great term. I opened up Wikipedia to start an article on it, and meant to quote you, however it seems one needs an account to create articles these days :P. You should put it in Wikipedia; you probably stumbled on something big. There's a huge money in software that could ruin a Senator's career. Just think... Frameware, a term first coined by Monoman in 2009, .... go write the article =D

Comment Remember your audience (Score 1) 301

Be cognizant of the fact that while the executives can translate actionable data into... action... they are often unable to figure out the information the data is conveying. Remember your audience. Instead of a latency chart, you might explain that 99% of customers (devices, etc) wait no longer than 10 seconds. Other great points above are: ask the executives, and agree on a mission statement. Is your job just to keep the computers running, or to lower capital costs? Do you take ownership of investigating possible hardware upgrades and new technologies?

Comment Three things (Score 2, Interesting) 131

Get your existing customers to bring in new ones by focusing on your Net Promoter Score. This is the % of customers that, when asked "would you refer this to a friend or colleague?", rate you 9 or 10, minus the % that rate you 6 or less. There's a lot of data showing that this metric correlates with growth.

Work on your Search Engine Optimization, i.e. appearing on the first page/first few hits, and buy key adwords.

Lastly, if you believe your app would be valuable to enterprise customers, hire an offshore concierge at $3/hour to do research on potential buyers. They work damn hard for their $3/hr.

But most of all, focus on your Net Promoter Score. You're literally investing in viral marketing probability. Traditionally marketing cannot fight the exponential growth of referrals.

Comment Who's really in charge (Score 5, Informative) 838

This thread contains lots of great perspectives on Ahmandinejad, election fraud, and the Iranian presidency. Unfortunately most of the world is missing the point.

I'd like to point that Ali Khamenei has been the supreme leader (dictator) of Iran for 20 years. During an EconTalk podcast on August 11 2008, expert Bruce Bueno de Mesquita comments that after interviewing over a dozen Iranian political specialists, his research concludes that Ahmandinejad is the 18th most powerful person in Iran.

The Iranian president is an important and powerful person in absolute terms. In relative terms it's a public relations office. So yes, election fraud was committed. Yes, their disinterest in concealing the fraud conveys the extent to which they believe it makes a difference.

However, everyone just take a deep breath, and understand that the electoral system and eligibility of candidates is up to the complete discretion of Ali Khamenei.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...