c:\>ping www.apple.com
Pinging www.apple.com [96.16.93.15] with 32 bytes
Request timed out. No Linux client
Request timed out. No mobile client
Request timed out. No universal browser access
Request timed out. Forced use of 80MB client software
Ping statistics for 96.16.93.15:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% fail)
yeah thats what i thought...
Except both of you are incorrect. There wasn't this massive mainframe competition. IBM was THE company. The others attempted to gain entry into their already owned MF market and at every corner because IBM had already a leg up on virtually all comers they used predatory practices and price pressure and refusal to cross license and highly restrictive software licenses to drive out any competition. They further forced any existing customer down a lengthy road of renewal negotiations if any outside big iron suddenly showed up. IBM is the master at that when it comes to their MF products. If had a nickle for every time I had to sit at the table with the MF reps as they squeezed out anyone who attempted to break into our shop id be a much wealthier person.
If you think there was lots of competition in the 90s you are highly mistaken. The few that were left held little niche market share and did so only due to the remaining anti-trust rules in place at the time. That market share then evaporated when clustered computing and personal computing took hold and not just marketing. The remaining companies could not compete against with IBM with that drop in sales and Microsft. UNIX systems too played a key role in eroding what was already slim sales of these firms compared to IBM. Even IBM suffered dearly in its MF division but was buoyed by its software and PC sales.
Having lived through this before and seen these claims before one would think IBM was all saintly and made all these massive improvements....mmmmmm no. The MF of today is relatively unchanged from the MF of 20 years ago. There have been upgrades and improvements for sure but no massive leaps. Newer silicon and face lift of the OS.
These claims that MS does not have a monopoly must come from those who apparently doent work with MF. They most certainly have a LOCK on the MAINFRAME market place and in the high TPS world, mainframe is still king.F ind a large bank of trading floor that doesn't have one locked away churning away. You might want to re-read that article you posted as well....IBMs z accounted for 9% of server revenue but what percent of MAINFRAME revenue where they certainly enjoy a monopoly position. When its comes to certain transaction based systems, GA systems etc. its mainframe or go out of business.
For the record IBM does indeed make some very good MF products that can in some cases be absolutely the king of reliability but it comes at a very very steep cost, kept artificially high due to their dominant and in many cases predatory position in that market.
Awesome Options 0.7 - its dev so you have to register https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8310
oldbar 1.2 - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6227
old location bar 1.8 - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7637
Location Bar Limit - https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/7674
Using AO and Oldbar I can get nearly 95% or better ff2 behavior of my old ff2 location bar
so while i hate it at least i can minimize my pain
Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall